The decentralized finance (DeFi) space is no stranger to fresh solutions that improve blockchain adoption, and financial instruments are no exception. One such instrument is bonding curves, smart contracts based on mathematical models. They play a crucial role in determining the price of tokens based on their circulating supply within decentralized networks.

The revolutionary nature of bonding curves requires an in-depth look at the evolution of bonding curves, functionality, various types, and their impact in the defi space.

What are Bonding Curves?

Source: yos.io

Bonding curves are automated systems based on smart contracts that use mathematical formulas to determine a token’s price based on the number of tokens in circulation. They help regulate the token’s value without outside interferences like traditional order book exchanges. Essentially, they operate as pricing systems, ensuring a balanced relationship between the token’s supply and price.

The main idea behind a bonding curve is that when a person acquires an asset that’s available in a limited quantity, the following people to acquire it would have to pay slightly more for it. This mechanism operates with the same principles as the law of demand and supply. If the number of available asset units decreases with each purchase, the asset’s price starts to increase, thus making the asset more valuable. As such, bonding curves tend to favor early participants.

Bonding curves also provide liquidity for newly issued tokens, eliminating the need for third parties and opting for an in-built system to provide consistent liquidity. When the token is released, it is automatically added to a liquidity pool that will provide a market, even if there aren’t many buyers or sellers.

Brief History of Bonding Curves

Bonding curves were created by Simon de la Rouviere, the founder of Untitled Frontier. He initially got the idea from economic models and game theory. He then modified the concept to fit the cryptocurrency industry since he felt its application would solve critical issues affecting token distribution and liquidity.

As the DeFi industry grew, so did bonding curves. Developers were able to experiment with using different curves to perform various functions. Some bonding curves encourage long-term asset holding, some focus on stabilizing price growth, while others are integrated into automated market makers (AMMs) and DEXs. Researchers are working on creating better models that are easier to use and finding new ways to use them in areas like NFTs and DAOs.

How Does it Work?

Bonding curves use the economic principles of supply and demand to create a self-sustaining market. They establish a direct relationship between a token’s circulating supply and price and automatically adjust prices to reflect that relationship. Lower circulating supply means lower prices, and higher supply means higher prices. Bonding curves can also be linear, exponential, or logarithmic, further influencing the pricing mechanism’s operation.

Types of Bonding Curves

Due to their versatility, bonding curves can serve different functions in different DeFi and blockchain projects. Choosing a bonding curve for a project is an important factor that can directly affect the token market. This can affect things like how much the token’s price changes, what encourages traders, and how stable the market is overall.

The main types of bonding curves include:

Linear curves

Linear bonding curves directly link a token’s circulating supply and price. They ensure that token prices increase as much as sales. This type of curve works best with stable markets because it makes the price changes more predictable while reducing significant price swings.

For example, if 100 tokens are initially available and each token is priced at $1, the price will stay the same until all 100 tokens are sold.

Exponential curves

Exponential curves increase prices after more tokens are distributed. They increase prices significantly when there is more demand. As prices go up while more tokens are bought, there is a sense of scarcity that, in turn, drives even more demand.

With exponential curves, prices mainly depend on how many tokens are available. Because the tiniest increase in supply can cause a significant price increase, it doesn’t take much for a token to quickly increase in value.

Early investors benefit the most from this curve since they can make maximum profits after buying at low prices and selling at high. This is why it is favored by projects that want to reward early participation. Although early investors take more risk since they cannot ascertain if the project will go on to do well, they still stand to make the most profit if the project breaks even.

Logarithmic Curves

Logarithmic curves are more liquidity-focused than other bonding curves. They indicate steady price increases, especially when more tokens are added. As such, prices will rapidly increase at first but then stabilize when there is more supply. Early investors also benefit from logarithmic curves since their tokens gain value quickly at the start, coupled with early liquidity.

What Role Do Bonding Curves Play in DeFi?

From serving as the underlying mechanism for AMMs to other functions like price discovery, bonding curves perform multiple functions in the decentralized finance space. The role of bonding curves in defi include:

Token Pricing Mechanism

Bonding curves are typically used to set and adjust token prices, but the price itself depends on the number of tokens available. As such, bonding curves offer a different method of establishing token prices compared to the order book model used in centralized exchanges.

Liquidity Provision

Bonding curves make trading more accessible for users by allowing them to buy directly from the curve. This approach boosts the functionality and operations of most DeFi systems while reducing the need for intermediaries.

Fundraising and Token Distribution

DeFi projects can use bonding curves for fundraising and distributing tokens. Instead of a traditional token sale where a fixed number of tokens are sold at a certain price, a project can create a bonding curve that issues tokens based on how much cryptocurrency is put into the curve. The more funds are added, the more tokens are released, and the price per token will change based on a specific math formula. As such, tokens are issued automatically as demand changes, making the distribution process fairer and decentralized.

Bonding curves enable continuous token issuance, with prices changing according to market demand. This approach ensures that there are always tokens to buy, making it a more convenient option for users.

Stablecoins and Collateralization

In some stablecoin systems, the bonding curve also ensures the stablecoin’s value remains steady. Essentially, it is responsible for minting and burning stablecoins so they don’t lose value. Bonding curves also hold underlying assets as collateral to strengthen the peg. Because users can buy or sell stablecoins directly from the curve, they can prioritize efficient trading with reduced price fluctuations.

Dynamic Pricing

Marketplaces can use bonding curves for dynamic pricing. This means that the price of something changes based on how many people want it. For example, when it comes to digital content like articles and videos, bonding curves allow creators to gain more profits as more people consume their content.

Examples of Projects Implementing Bonding Curves

Popular projects that have started leveraging bonding curves include:

Uniswap

Uniswap, a decentralized exchange, uses a unique automated market maker (AMM) model to create liquidity pools where users can swap tokens. This model integrated a constant product bonding curve to ensure that token prices are stable, even if the supply changes.

Aave

Aave is a lending platform operating on the Ethereum blockchain that uses AMMs to facilitate its lending protocols. Like Uniswap, the project uses a constant product bonding curve to provide lower interest rates and stabilize Aave’s lending token supply. This ensures that borrowers continue to enjoy low interest rates, regardless of any fluctuations in the amount of borrowed funds.

Balancer

Balancer is another decentralized AMM that incentivizes users to provide liquidity for trading pools. These users then earn part of the trading fees generated by the pools they contributed to and native BAL tokens. Balancer uses a constant elasticity bonding curve instead of the constant product bonding curve, which enables it to support more tradable assets and strategies.

Pump.fun

Pump.fun is a decentralized marketplace on Solana that allows users to create and distribute their tokens (mostly memecoins). It is a popular platform amongst memecoin enthusiasts, with interoperability functions across ecosystems like TON and Polkadot.

Pump.fun utilizes bonding curves to minimize the risk of rug pulls and establish a fair and decentralized ecosystem for all participants. User-created tokens are gaining more popularity than traditional memecoins. These new tokens often skip the usual presale and team allocation stages, which helps lower the risk of scams and ensures a more equitable distribution. As such, bonding curves help the project create a level playing field for everyone to compete.

Difference Between Bonding Curves and Traditional Order Book Exchanges

The key distinction between bonding curves and traditional order book exchanges is that bonding curves remove the need for buyers and sellers to match orders. While traditional books maintain a full list of buy and sell orders and try to match buyers and sellers, bonding curves enable users to buy or sell tokens directly from the smart contract. This creates an automated process that simplifies trading and enhances liquidity for users.

Challenges Associated With Implementing Bonding Curves

Bonding curves hold great promise, but they also present risks and challenges that must be carefully considered. One challenge is the complexity of creating effective bonding curves. It requires intricate modeling to align the incentives and prevent price manipulation. If the curve is poorly designed, it could lead to unintended consequences and market instability.

Another concern is the security risks associated with the smart contracts governing bonding curves. As a fairly new solution, these contracts still need thorough audits to prevent potential exploits that could compromise the asset’s pricing mechanism and integrity.

In addition, regulatory compliance is a significant consideration. The legal status of tokens issued through bonding curves varies across different jurisdictions. As a result, projects must navigate complex regulatory landscapes to comply with laws related to local securities and token classifications.

Conclusion

Bonding curves are set to be a transformative tool in the DeFi industry, providing a more balanced and automated market for digital assets. Providing a direct link between token supply and pricing will increase liquidity and open new project funding pathways. Bonding curves are expected to play a big role in shaping the future of autonomics and governance.

However, successfully implementing bonding curves requires careful consideration of design, security, and regulatory factors to harness their potential fully.