On January 11th, the official announcement of Berachain’s public testnet, Artio, went live. Despite rumors of its launch since November last year, the delay did not diminish the market’s attention. In less than ten days, Artio has attracted over 1 million testnet users and over 70 ecosystem DApps. This begs the question, what makes Berachain unique?
Berachain originated from the Bong Bears NFT project, which was jointly launched by several old OHM OGs, and subsequently attracted a number of OHM OG investors to join.”Bera” is a typo deliberately made by Bear in order to pay tribute to the old crypto-meme “Hodl”.
Berachain has now developed into a high-performance EVM-compatible blockchain, built based on the Proof-of-Liquidity (PoL) consensus mechanism, with the goal of strengthening the synergy between Berachain validators and the project ecosystem. Adjust network incentive mechanisms. Additionally, Berachain’s technology is based on Polaris, a high-performance modular framework for building EVM-compatible chains on top of the CometBFT consensus engine.
Berachain completed a $42 million Series A round of financing in April 2023, with a valuation reaching $420.69 million. Polychain Capital led the investment, and OKX Ventures, Hack VC, former Dragonfly Capital partner, Celestia founder Mustafa Al-Bassam and Tendermint jointly Founder Zaki Manian and others participated in the investment.
Berachain uses a three-token mechanism consisting of BERA, BGT (governance token), and HONEY stablecoin. Each token plays a specific role in the network:
In addition to the three tokens, there is a concept that needs to be understood - BCV (block capture value). Certain transactions in the three DApps of BEX, Honey, and Perps will generate a fee, which is passed on by BCV. This means that validators can earn these fees as rewards as long as they include one of these fee-generating transactions in their blocks. Validators collect a portion of BCV as commission and transfer the remaining portion to BGT delegates. This implies that staking BGT can be profitable because it allows you to earn BERA, BGT, and HONEY.
To summarize, users deposit assets (such as ETH, BTC, USDC, etc.) into the system to receive Bera tokens. Subsequently, the system pairs these assets with Honey to provide liquidity for AMM and other protocols. This increased liquidity attracts more traders and projects, generating more transaction fees for BGT. Since there are limited ways to obtain BGT and staking BGT allows you to earn BERA, BGT, and HONEY, the system continuously attracts more assets, creating a flywheel effect.
PoL differs from traditional PoS systems in that it requires users to contribute to network security by providing liquidity for on-chain DeFi primitives such as AMM DEX, perpetual exchanges, and stablecoin lending platforms. This mechanism directly links the act of providing liquidity with enhanced network security, promoting incentive alignment between network security and liquidity.
The operation of this mechanism can be broken down into several key links:
Polaris provides an execution environment for smart contracts on Berachain. It is a feature-rich, highly modular framework that is seamlessly integrated with the Cosmos ecosystem. Its core features include:
After understanding this, one can realize that Berachain is not a technologically weak Meme chain. In fact, Berachain’s three-token model and PoL consensus mechanism are designed very cleverly in the efficient market, ensuring a continuous flow of value back to the users. In addition, on Berachain, users are not only investors, but also active participants in the ecosystem. This combination of in-depth participation and incentive mechanism is the core advantage that distinguishes Berachain from traditional Meme chains.
But it’s worth noting that both OHM and Luna, known for their unique tokenomic models, both ended up suffering major crashes that resulted in significant losses in market cap. The collapse of these two projects was mainly attributed to the unsustainability of their token issuance and staking mechanisms, as well as their over-reliance on liquidity. As for Berachain, although it attempts to create a more robust and sustainable economy through its three-token model and liquidity proof consensus mechanism, whether it can truly avoid the risks seen in the cases of OHM and Luna remains to be observed.
On January 11th, the official announcement of Berachain’s public testnet, Artio, went live. Despite rumors of its launch since November last year, the delay did not diminish the market’s attention. In less than ten days, Artio has attracted over 1 million testnet users and over 70 ecosystem DApps. This begs the question, what makes Berachain unique?
Berachain originated from the Bong Bears NFT project, which was jointly launched by several old OHM OGs, and subsequently attracted a number of OHM OG investors to join.”Bera” is a typo deliberately made by Bear in order to pay tribute to the old crypto-meme “Hodl”.
Berachain has now developed into a high-performance EVM-compatible blockchain, built based on the Proof-of-Liquidity (PoL) consensus mechanism, with the goal of strengthening the synergy between Berachain validators and the project ecosystem. Adjust network incentive mechanisms. Additionally, Berachain’s technology is based on Polaris, a high-performance modular framework for building EVM-compatible chains on top of the CometBFT consensus engine.
Berachain completed a $42 million Series A round of financing in April 2023, with a valuation reaching $420.69 million. Polychain Capital led the investment, and OKX Ventures, Hack VC, former Dragonfly Capital partner, Celestia founder Mustafa Al-Bassam and Tendermint jointly Founder Zaki Manian and others participated in the investment.
Berachain uses a three-token mechanism consisting of BERA, BGT (governance token), and HONEY stablecoin. Each token plays a specific role in the network:
In addition to the three tokens, there is a concept that needs to be understood - BCV (block capture value). Certain transactions in the three DApps of BEX, Honey, and Perps will generate a fee, which is passed on by BCV. This means that validators can earn these fees as rewards as long as they include one of these fee-generating transactions in their blocks. Validators collect a portion of BCV as commission and transfer the remaining portion to BGT delegates. This implies that staking BGT can be profitable because it allows you to earn BERA, BGT, and HONEY.
To summarize, users deposit assets (such as ETH, BTC, USDC, etc.) into the system to receive Bera tokens. Subsequently, the system pairs these assets with Honey to provide liquidity for AMM and other protocols. This increased liquidity attracts more traders and projects, generating more transaction fees for BGT. Since there are limited ways to obtain BGT and staking BGT allows you to earn BERA, BGT, and HONEY, the system continuously attracts more assets, creating a flywheel effect.
PoL differs from traditional PoS systems in that it requires users to contribute to network security by providing liquidity for on-chain DeFi primitives such as AMM DEX, perpetual exchanges, and stablecoin lending platforms. This mechanism directly links the act of providing liquidity with enhanced network security, promoting incentive alignment between network security and liquidity.
The operation of this mechanism can be broken down into several key links:
Polaris provides an execution environment for smart contracts on Berachain. It is a feature-rich, highly modular framework that is seamlessly integrated with the Cosmos ecosystem. Its core features include:
After understanding this, one can realize that Berachain is not a technologically weak Meme chain. In fact, Berachain’s three-token model and PoL consensus mechanism are designed very cleverly in the efficient market, ensuring a continuous flow of value back to the users. In addition, on Berachain, users are not only investors, but also active participants in the ecosystem. This combination of in-depth participation and incentive mechanism is the core advantage that distinguishes Berachain from traditional Meme chains.
But it’s worth noting that both OHM and Luna, known for their unique tokenomic models, both ended up suffering major crashes that resulted in significant losses in market cap. The collapse of these two projects was mainly attributed to the unsustainability of their token issuance and staking mechanisms, as well as their over-reliance on liquidity. As for Berachain, although it attempts to create a more robust and sustainable economy through its three-token model and liquidity proof consensus mechanism, whether it can truly avoid the risks seen in the cases of OHM and Luna remains to be observed.