AI Agent "havoc in the heavenly palace", and the Crypto environment has changed drastically

Explain why the 'environment has changed'? Essentially, this wave of AI Agent-driven enthusiasm is a major reshuffle of the Crypto's rigid system in the past:

AI Agent pre-application?

In the past, it took 1-3 years of long-term cultivation to 'deliver' a public chain. After the Roadmap is completed and the TGE is completed, it is found that the landing of users and application ecology is difficult to match the market's expected value, resulting in many infrastructures that are detached from the actual market demand;

In the future, no matter what project, let AI Agent run on the chain first, and let the functionality, performance, and experience of AI Agent speak to support the technical foundation of the chain infrastructure. Use application front-loading to verify market demand and avoid carrying solutions without landing applications.

Community MEME-ization launch?

In the past, VC capital drove the birth of top-tier projects. The information asymmetry in the primary market has led to increasingly narrow profit margins in the secondary market. This has resulted in Western and Eastern capital not taking over each other, VCs and exchanges stacking up positions, and many other issues such as high FDV depreciation after Token listing.

In the future, projects will be built in the form of open source Public Good. There will be no white paper in the short term, but there will be Github open source libraries. There will be no Roadmap, but there will be visible product applications. It will directly face the secondary market financing, let AI Agent independently manage assets, and use the continuous growth of asset pool and the continuous growth of Holder to bring greater imagination space for the project. Early Builders only need to continue to empower the project.

Partner co-construction?

In the past, the project team usually gave a certain percentage of airdrops in order to obtain early users, traffic, etc., and users continued to contribute gas and time in order to get airdrops, but this has caused a "witch community" culture of either making a profit and fleeing, which brings follow-up operational pressure to the project, or a group of people have been PUA by the project party for a long time, and they have not fulfilled their expectations or run empty, and contradictions and conflicts are inevitable, and both loses;

In the future, the project party will use MEME-ified secondary opening, designed for sustainable growth of Tokenomics (LP fees, transaction taxes, release of reserve shares, etc.). In this process, community users are both early investors and continuous co-builders of community consensus, basically most of them are worth the basic final profit, win-win.

The dominance of on-chain DEX?

In the past, most projects in the DEX stage had low circulation and a small user base. Only through Tokenomics design, sustained community reputation and growth, as well as resource 'matching', could they obtain tickets to CEX. Under heavy pressure, some projects would lie flat after TGE.

In the future, most projects will choose to continuously build in the DEX stage, and the on-chain DEX will undertake most of the market liquidity. Although on-chain prosperity will present a "chaotic era", high-quality projects have a greater chance of a "grassroots counterattack" without being buried under the discourse power of the old system's CEX, and will gradually tend towards DEX as the mainstay, with CEX only existing as a supplement to liquidity?

From Entrepreneurs' "Jargon" >> Founders' "Joking and Cursing"?

In the past, the market was very inward-looking, with many projects, so much so that there was a stark gap between leading and trailing projects. After the founders of leading projects succeeded, they began to engage in introspection, doing public welfare, charity, and showing a strong Islamic flavor;

For future project parties, if they do not integrate with the community and are not always focused on the product front line, it will be difficult for the market and ecology to have a chance to emerge. The new market operation rules will force the founder to be at the forefront, 'laughing and scolding', although this may also lead to questioning, but a 'real' Dev image is always better than a lofty 'entrepreneur', at least from the perspective of retail investors.

Note: The above transformation and reshuffling are not absolute, nor will they happen overnight. It is more likely to generate a variety of mixed play modes, and there will probably be numerous problems in the early stage. However, it is still a glimmer of hope for breaking through the current rigid system.