The rapid growth of the Sui ecosystem has recently caught the market’s attention. On-chain data reveals that Sui’s daily capital inflows have surged, at times even surpassing established blockchains like Ethereum (ETH) and Avalanche (AVAX), which has drawn a wave of investor interest. However, just as Sui was gaining momentum, the price of the SUI token experienced a 6% drop within 24 hours, falling from a peak of $2.25 to $1.68. This apparent strength in inflows belies short-term price volatility. What market logic is underlying this fluctuation? Is it merely a temporary pullback, or a sign of emerging potential? In this article, we will analyze Sui’s opportunities and potential through four lenses: ecosystem status, user composition, competitive comparison, and future trends, to explore whether Sui could become a noteworthy new contender in the public blockchain market.

Previous Report: SUI Leads the Crypto Market Rally: DeFi Ecosystem Expansion and Grayscale Trust Support—Can Prices Continue to Soar?

Price Decline Amid High Inflows: A Signal of Market Unrest

1. The Paradox of Capital Inflows

On the surface, Sui’s significant capital inflows appear to be a strongly bullish signal. According to data from Artemis, over the past three months, SUI ranked third in net capital inflows, surpassing even Ethereum (ETH), Avalanche (AVAX), and Fantom (FTM). This on-chain indicator supports the narrative that SUI could experience a price reversal. Additionally, Sui has outlined a timeline to address its staking allocation issues, which could impact price trends positively.

User Composition

Ethereum-based inflows make up a staggering 78% of all funds entering the Sui network. This trend suggests that Ethereum users are increasingly drawn to the Sui ecosystem, reflecting a shift as investors seek a more efficient, lower-cost on-chain experience and opt to transfer their capital to Sui. In comparison, Solana represents just 11.2% of capital inflows into Sui.

This phenomenon highlights Sui’s appeal among high-frequency traders and cost-sensitive users. However, it also suggests that these capital inflows are likely opportunistic, aimed at short-term gains rather than long-term commitments. With DeFi markets and liquidity mining rewards as primary drivers, this capital seems more inclined toward short-term arbitrage than establishing a lasting presence.

In other words, while the high inflow volume appears promising, it may not signify stable, long-term support. If market sentiment shifts, the sell pressure from these short-term capital flows could be stronger than expected. This paradox—between rising inflow volume and declining prices—has already introduced a sense of unease in the market. Can this influx of bottom-fishing and short-term speculative capital truly sustain Sui’s mid- to long-term value?

2. The “Time Bomb” of Selling Pressure and Token Unlocking Mechanisms

One key concern in Sui’s tokenomics is its upcoming token unlock event. On November 1st, 64.19 million SUI tokens will be unlocked, representing 2.32% of the total circulating supply—a substantial test for the market. In recent months, the market has become highly sensitive to token unlock events, often viewing them as precursors to price corrections. If significant selling pressure emerges in the short term, the price of SUI may experience further declines. Should it drop below the critical support level of $1.45, market sentiment could deteriorate further, potentially triggering additional sell-offs.

Current Status of the Sui Ecosystem: Absence of a Meme Economy and the “Double-Edged Sword” of SocialFi and GameFi

In today’s crypto market, Meme tokens play a critical role in driving on-chain activity. For example, on Solana, the Meme economy has fueled widespread community engagement, becoming a key pillar of user activity. In contrast, the Sui ecosystem lacks a strong Meme component and also faces risks of short-term gains and low user retention within SocialFi and GameFi. Let’s take a closer look at these dynamics, including the “double-edged sword” of SocialFi and GameFi users, the absence of a Meme economy, and the risks of liquidity pool short-term arbitrage.

1. The “Double-Edged Sword” of SocialFi and GameFi Users

Data indicates that over 60% of active users on the Sui blockchain are concentrated in SocialFi and GameFi, the primary sources of traffic within its ecosystem. For instance, SocialFi project RECRD has attracted a large number of short-video creators through its ad-sharing model, reaching 370,000 daily active users and driving on-chain activity. Similarly, GameFi project SuiBirds, with its innovative gameplay, has drawn 120,000 daily active users, demonstrating rapid growth in this segment.

However, the concentration of users within SocialFi and GameFi is not entirely positive. SocialFi user activity heavily relies on advertising revenue sharing, which is inherently dependent on advertisers’ spending and conversion rates. If ad returns on investment (ROI) fail to meet advertiser expectations, ad revenue could decrease sharply, reducing platform activity. In the long term, this model lacks stability and poses a high risk of user attrition.

The speculative nature of GameFi is even more pronounced. Many users join liquidity pools within games to earn rewards, drawn by high returns. However, this short-term capital is highly susceptible to market sentiment. If pool rewards become unsustainable or decline, users may withdraw rapidly, causing extreme fluctuations in on-chain capital flow. For Sui, expanding beyond SocialFi and GameFi to develop more stable application scenarios is essential to its ecosystem’s sustainable growth.

2. The Absence of a Meme Ecosystem: Weak Market Narrative

Currently, only a handful of meme projects on the Sui blockchain have reached a significant market scale, with HIPPO being the only one close to a $100 million market cap. This stands in stark contrast to Solana, where numerous meme projects boast high valuations and active engagement, drawing substantial user interest and community involvement. This difference stems not only from varying market demands but also from divergent choices by the founding teams regarding market narrative. Solana’s founders actively participate in meme-related discussions, especially on social platforms like Twitter, which has directly fueled the growth of Solana’s meme ecosystem. In contrast, the Sui team has adopted a more reserved, pragmatic approach, rarely engaging in meme discussions, resulting in limited attention on its meme ecosystem.

From a market perspective, a meme ecosystem not only serves as a means of attracting users but also plays a crucial role in maintaining engagement within the crypto community. For Sui, the lack of a meme ecosystem means it has less appeal to user groups interested in current trends, which may hinder the growth of its on-chain ecosystem. While this gap may not pose a significant disadvantage in the short term, as the meme narrative continues to resonate, Sui’s ecosystem expansion could face challenges in attracting sufficient traffic.

3. The Risk of Short-term Arbitrage Capital: Challenges of High-Yield Liquidity Pools

Liquidity pools on Sui, such as Cetus, Deep, and Kriya, currently offer exceptionally high annual yields, with the Kriya liquidity pool’s annual return reaching as high as 7,398%, significantly surpassing the rates on many other platforms. This has drawn a surge of short-term arbitrage capital. However, high yields come with high risks. While this model can temporarily boost on-chain activity, it is inherently unstable and prone to becoming overly speculative in the long run.

In times of bullish market sentiment, a flood of short-term arbitrage capital may elevate on-chain activity. However, if sentiment declines or returns from liquidity pools fall short of expectations, these arbitrage funds may quickly exit, leading to substantial on-chain volatility. For Sui, an ecosystem model reliant on high-yield liquidity pools struggles to maintain stable user engagement over the long term, and it risks market instability if there is a mass capital exodus.

Competitive Comparison: The “Tech and Ecosystem Battle” Between Sui and Aptos

1. Technical Architecture: The Trade-off Between Latency and Consensus Mechanisms

From a foundational technology perspective, both Sui and Aptos are built with high-performance, low-latency architectures. To enhance user experience, Sui has gradually adopted the Mysticeti consensus engine to replace its former Narwhal architecture, resulting in improvements to transaction completion time. However, compared to Aptos, Sui still has slightly higher transaction latency, and network congestion may become an issue as market capacity grows.

Recent data shows that Sui’s transaction completion time is approximately 672 milliseconds, which is longer than Aptos. This difference may be due to Sui’s ongoing transition from the Narwhal to the Mysticeti consensus engine. Low latency provides users with a seamless experience in DeFi and high-frequency trading applications.

Aptos, leveraging its innovative block structure design, demonstrates stronger performance in terms of transactions per second (TPS) and response latency, making it particularly well-suited for DeFi and high-frequency trading scenarios. This advantage in user experience attracts users with high demands for low latency and efficiency. As things currently stand, Aptos is catching up to Sui in terms of user growth rate and ecosystem expansion, exerting significant competitive pressure on Sui.

2. User Engagement: How Long Can Sui Maintain Its “Lead” Position?

Data shows that Sui leads Aptos in key metrics like total value locked (TVL), daily active addresses, and daily transaction volume. Currently, Sui’s TVL stands at $1 billion, substantially higher than Aptos’ $790 million, indicating more active user engagement and transaction frequency on the Sui chain. However, Aptos’ rapid growth rate warrants attention. Over the past three months, Aptos has made notable strides in the NFT and GameFi sectors, suggesting that its ecosystem is becoming increasingly attractive to users.

For Sui, this competition emphasizes the need to continually improve user experience and retain market attention. Although Sui’s current lead is clear, maintaining its competitive edge in the market may be challenging if it cannot further enhance user stickiness and ecosystem depth. Aptos’ swift rise could gradually erode Sui’s market position if it does not address these factors.

Future Trends for SUI: Technical Chart Analysis and Investment Opportunities

1. Chart Support Levels and Key Technical Indicators

From a technical chart perspective, SUI’s current price movement exhibits clear support and resistance levels. Based on the current trend, SUI’s price is trading above the 99-day exponential moving average (EMA99), which is around $1.45. This level has recently served as a critical support point and has played a significant role in absorbing price pullbacks. The EMA99 is widely used for assessing long-term trends, and SUI maintaining its position above this line would bolster long-term bullish confidence in the market.

Moreover, SUI’s price has recently been fluctuating above the 0.618 Fibonacci retracement level at $1.63, indicating that this price point offers short-term support. Fibonacci retracement levels are commonly used by investors to identify potential pullback and bounce points. If SUI’s price can hold above this level, bullish momentum may drive further price increases in the next market rebound.

2. Risks and Opportunities from Technical Indicators

Volume fluctuations are another crucial indicator to consider. According to Santiment data, SUI’s trading volume surged by 12.2% over the past 24 hours, accompanied by a price drop, which typically indicates significant selling pressure. If volume continues to rise without a corresponding price recovery, this suggests stronger market selling pressure that may push prices further downward in the short term. However, if prices stabilize while volume decreases, it may signal easing selling pressure, creating a foundation for a potential price rebound.

Other technical indicators, such as the Relative Strength Index (RSI) and Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD), also warrant attention. A rebound in the RSI from below 30, or a bullish crossover in MACD at low levels, could indicate a short-term recovery signal.

Currently, the major resistance level for SUI is at $2.36. If SUI can break and sustain its price above this level, it would generate a clear bullish signal, potentially initiating a new upward trend. If this resistance remains unbroken, the price may continue to consolidate between $1.63 and $2.36, forming a sideways trading pattern.

Should bullish momentum fail to keep SUI’s price above $1.63, the support at $1.45 will become a critical defensive level. A break below this point could trigger further sell-offs, with the next support level at the $1.30 range. The strength of this support zone will be key in determining whether the market is poised for further retracement.

Conclusion: Sui’s Potential and Challenges

Overall, the Sui ecosystem demonstrates significant innovation in blockchain technology and application scenarios, especially in its ventures into emerging areas like SocialFi and GameFi, where it is steadily becoming a force to be reckoned with. However, with the rapid rise of competitor Aptos, the sell pressure from token unlock events, and market fluctuations driven by short-term arbitrage capital, Sui must further enhance ecosystem expansion and user stability. Only by addressing these challenges can Sui move beyond speculation and volatility, ultimately establishing itself as a true pioneer in the public blockchain space.

Disclaimer：

1. This article is reprinted from [Marsbit]. All copyrights belong to the original author [Marshmallows]. If there are objections to this reprint, please contact the Gate Learn) team, and they will handle it promptly.

2. Liability Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not constitute any investment advice.

3. Translations of the article into other languages are done by the Gate Learn team. Unless mentioned, copying, distributing, or plagiarizing the translated articles is prohibited.