It’s also estimated that 9 in 10 blockchain projects will fail, and an average lifespan of a token is just 15 months.
With success rate this low, I want to share my thinking to identify the projects that could survive and flourish.
The problem is – there are so many projects, but our time & energy is limited. It would be great to spend days researching one token, but crypto moves fast so save some energy for the decision making.
That’s why I focus on the most important parts of tokenomics that really matter.
According to Sinek, “very few people or companies can clearly articulate why they do what they do.”
This is even more applicable to crypto projects and their tokens as well. It seems like projects pop-up daily based on a dominant narrative at the time.
I believe that before investing in a token, spend some time to understand why a project needs a token in the first place.
This can be broken down into three questions:
Actually, I believe that most projects don’t even need a token to function. Think if the projects below really need a token to function?
Ignas | DeFi Research @DefiIgnas
1/ Do #DeFi protocols really need a token to work? 🧵
For example, it’s possible that the vampire attack by Sushiswap might have compelled Uniswap to issue their own token. $UNI has been for a while like a nuisance but thanks to potential revenue sharing finally launching, UNI starts to make sense.
In any case, most projects issue a token anyway. There are obvious reason why:
So many protocols treat tokens just as a fundraising tool (obviously, they don’t say it openly).
But great projects are those that have deeper underlying reasons for the token to exist. These are well-thought features that are not that obvious:
Understand the real reason a project ISSUED a token before investing, that goes beyond fundraising goals.
The “how” part can be complex, especially for projects that use innovative game theory.
Every project has the tokenomics explanation in its documentation section. Finding ‘how’ it works is easy. Understanding it well is more challenging.
I believe that the best token designs have a flywheel effect - a virtuous cycle that drives adoption, usage, and appreciation of the token.
This creates a positive feedback loop that reinforces the token’s ecosystem.
veTokenomics by Curve is probably the most copied design: veCRV encourages long term holding, incentivizes liquidity and attracts other protocols to build on top of Curve.
Remember, however, that token designs vary in complexity, with some being intentionally complicated to deceive investors, and others offering unique innovation and creating value.
Your challenge is to differentiate between the two.
After all, “If you don’t understand where the yield comes from, you are the yield.”
Staking is probably the simplest and arguably most useful feature of a token. And if a project manages to reward users with ecosystem airdrop tokens, then it’s a strong value proposition. Think of Celestia’s TIA or ATOM by Cosmos.
Yet once in a while a token appears that is so unique and different, that it changes the trajectory of the industry. The originality of tokenomics can push the industry forward and jump-start a new bull market.
My goal is to find those tokens before the rest. Here are 7 examples from the past:
2023年1月24日
After understanding the underlying reasons why the token exists, and how it works, its time to find out how a token generates value to investors. We don’t want a token that doesn’t have any use case.
Examples:
Be wary of projects that raise money and then neglect their token holders.
Most popular examples are revenue sharing from protocol fees. Or some projects have integrated the token into the core functioning of the protocol.
For example, Pendle with its vePendle design is pumping. vePENDLE rewards users with boosted LP APY and the share of protocol revenue. And since Pendle managed to position itself as the yield/points farming hub of DeFi, the token benefits from increased adoption/TVL and other metrics.
vePENDLE also give right to vote on incentive distribution. Overall, vePENDLE tokenomics are simple and value accrual is straight forward.
Evaluate the market cap (MC) vs fully diluted valuation (FDV) ratio.
A low MC/FDV ratio means more tokens are going to be released to the market, putting downward pressure on price.
Consider who will buy those newly issued tokens!
I agree with this qw that FDV is a meme in a short run. Just look at how much Worldcoin recently pumped!
But you probably don’t want to hold these tokens when the bear market kicks in. In the end, the real demand should offset the supply increase.
My current thinking for this cycle is short to mid-term: market cap matters more than FDV as long as major unlocks are 6 or more months away.
Assess a token’s long-term potential by understanding the token allocation. There’s no simple answer what allocation ratio is the best. It differs per project and dominating narrative at a time.
Remember the ‘Fair launch’ tokens with 0% allocation to the team?
Everyone is focused on that fact, that too big allocation to the team can lead to sell-offs.
Yet small allocation to the team is also a problem: too little can undermine the team’s financial motivation to build.
Andre Cronje famously wrote in his “Building in defi sucks (part 2)” blog post that giving 100% of the tokens to the community was a mistake.
I still have all the responsibility and expectation, except I have 0 of the reward or upside. Don’t do this, I was an idiot. - Andre Cronje
It seems the ‘fair launch’ trend is out of the window for now. The last attempt was BRC20 tokens but 99% of them quickly inflated away…
I focus on mid-to-long-term holding so I look for tokens with a long-term linear unlock schedule (no big cliff unlocks) and MC/FDV ratio above 0.8. Team and VC allocation around 30%.
If your focus is on short-term trading, you should master token analytic tools:
(Example: Top 100 holders collectively own 89% SNX, but in fact 32% are locked in staking)
Other less know tools below:
Ignas | DeFi Research @DefiIgnas
1/ Staying on top of the #DeFi & #NFT game requires research and analytics tools.
These are my top 10 under-the-radar resources to help you stay ahead: 🧵
If you are looking for the 100x tokens, I’ve shared 5 strategies in the previous blog post:
3月20日
Check if there is real demand for the token and if you can buy it.
Don’t rely on trading volume alone as crypto exchanges are notorious for “wash trading”- buying and selling tokens from themselves to create an illusion of demand.
Check liquidity depth on Coingecko or Coinmarketcap to assess the real liquidity.
There are sometimes unique token designs, but the liquidity is low which means big investors who can push the price up cannot come.
The “what” part is straightforward - it’s the features of the token, such as voting, staking, VIP access, payments within the app, or burn on every transaction.
In my experience, projects that don’t know “why they do what they do” often focus on offering the most features possible. There are all over the website with intricate graphics and design to entice you to BUY NOW.
However, don’t fall for simple marketing - look at how these features support the protocol’s growth and create real value for token holders.
I liked this simple approach by Crypto Linn to invest in protocols that make their users rich. A simple yet powerful framework.
One to three killer use-cases are all you need.
Finding the next gem token can be a challenging task, especially with the sheer number of new tokens being introduced on a daily basis.
It’s difficult to keep up with all the new projects and conduct thorough research on each one of them.
That’s why I kept this guide short and simple – it can be summarized in just 6 actionable points:
It’s also estimated that 9 in 10 blockchain projects will fail, and an average lifespan of a token is just 15 months.
With success rate this low, I want to share my thinking to identify the projects that could survive and flourish.
The problem is – there are so many projects, but our time & energy is limited. It would be great to spend days researching one token, but crypto moves fast so save some energy for the decision making.
That’s why I focus on the most important parts of tokenomics that really matter.
According to Sinek, “very few people or companies can clearly articulate why they do what they do.”
This is even more applicable to crypto projects and their tokens as well. It seems like projects pop-up daily based on a dominant narrative at the time.
I believe that before investing in a token, spend some time to understand why a project needs a token in the first place.
This can be broken down into three questions:
Actually, I believe that most projects don’t even need a token to function. Think if the projects below really need a token to function?
Ignas | DeFi Research @DefiIgnas
1/ Do #DeFi protocols really need a token to work? 🧵
For example, it’s possible that the vampire attack by Sushiswap might have compelled Uniswap to issue their own token. $UNI has been for a while like a nuisance but thanks to potential revenue sharing finally launching, UNI starts to make sense.
In any case, most projects issue a token anyway. There are obvious reason why:
So many protocols treat tokens just as a fundraising tool (obviously, they don’t say it openly).
But great projects are those that have deeper underlying reasons for the token to exist. These are well-thought features that are not that obvious:
Understand the real reason a project ISSUED a token before investing, that goes beyond fundraising goals.
The “how” part can be complex, especially for projects that use innovative game theory.
Every project has the tokenomics explanation in its documentation section. Finding ‘how’ it works is easy. Understanding it well is more challenging.
I believe that the best token designs have a flywheel effect - a virtuous cycle that drives adoption, usage, and appreciation of the token.
This creates a positive feedback loop that reinforces the token’s ecosystem.
veTokenomics by Curve is probably the most copied design: veCRV encourages long term holding, incentivizes liquidity and attracts other protocols to build on top of Curve.
Remember, however, that token designs vary in complexity, with some being intentionally complicated to deceive investors, and others offering unique innovation and creating value.
Your challenge is to differentiate between the two.
After all, “If you don’t understand where the yield comes from, you are the yield.”
Staking is probably the simplest and arguably most useful feature of a token. And if a project manages to reward users with ecosystem airdrop tokens, then it’s a strong value proposition. Think of Celestia’s TIA or ATOM by Cosmos.
Yet once in a while a token appears that is so unique and different, that it changes the trajectory of the industry. The originality of tokenomics can push the industry forward and jump-start a new bull market.
My goal is to find those tokens before the rest. Here are 7 examples from the past:
2023年1月24日
After understanding the underlying reasons why the token exists, and how it works, its time to find out how a token generates value to investors. We don’t want a token that doesn’t have any use case.
Examples:
Be wary of projects that raise money and then neglect their token holders.
Most popular examples are revenue sharing from protocol fees. Or some projects have integrated the token into the core functioning of the protocol.
For example, Pendle with its vePendle design is pumping. vePENDLE rewards users with boosted LP APY and the share of protocol revenue. And since Pendle managed to position itself as the yield/points farming hub of DeFi, the token benefits from increased adoption/TVL and other metrics.
vePENDLE also give right to vote on incentive distribution. Overall, vePENDLE tokenomics are simple and value accrual is straight forward.
Evaluate the market cap (MC) vs fully diluted valuation (FDV) ratio.
A low MC/FDV ratio means more tokens are going to be released to the market, putting downward pressure on price.
Consider who will buy those newly issued tokens!
I agree with this qw that FDV is a meme in a short run. Just look at how much Worldcoin recently pumped!
But you probably don’t want to hold these tokens when the bear market kicks in. In the end, the real demand should offset the supply increase.
My current thinking for this cycle is short to mid-term: market cap matters more than FDV as long as major unlocks are 6 or more months away.
Assess a token’s long-term potential by understanding the token allocation. There’s no simple answer what allocation ratio is the best. It differs per project and dominating narrative at a time.
Remember the ‘Fair launch’ tokens with 0% allocation to the team?
Everyone is focused on that fact, that too big allocation to the team can lead to sell-offs.
Yet small allocation to the team is also a problem: too little can undermine the team’s financial motivation to build.
Andre Cronje famously wrote in his “Building in defi sucks (part 2)” blog post that giving 100% of the tokens to the community was a mistake.
I still have all the responsibility and expectation, except I have 0 of the reward or upside. Don’t do this, I was an idiot. - Andre Cronje
It seems the ‘fair launch’ trend is out of the window for now. The last attempt was BRC20 tokens but 99% of them quickly inflated away…
I focus on mid-to-long-term holding so I look for tokens with a long-term linear unlock schedule (no big cliff unlocks) and MC/FDV ratio above 0.8. Team and VC allocation around 30%.
If your focus is on short-term trading, you should master token analytic tools:
(Example: Top 100 holders collectively own 89% SNX, but in fact 32% are locked in staking)
Other less know tools below:
Ignas | DeFi Research @DefiIgnas
1/ Staying on top of the #DeFi & #NFT game requires research and analytics tools.
These are my top 10 under-the-radar resources to help you stay ahead: 🧵
If you are looking for the 100x tokens, I’ve shared 5 strategies in the previous blog post:
3月20日
Check if there is real demand for the token and if you can buy it.
Don’t rely on trading volume alone as crypto exchanges are notorious for “wash trading”- buying and selling tokens from themselves to create an illusion of demand.
Check liquidity depth on Coingecko or Coinmarketcap to assess the real liquidity.
There are sometimes unique token designs, but the liquidity is low which means big investors who can push the price up cannot come.
The “what” part is straightforward - it’s the features of the token, such as voting, staking, VIP access, payments within the app, or burn on every transaction.
In my experience, projects that don’t know “why they do what they do” often focus on offering the most features possible. There are all over the website with intricate graphics and design to entice you to BUY NOW.
However, don’t fall for simple marketing - look at how these features support the protocol’s growth and create real value for token holders.
I liked this simple approach by Crypto Linn to invest in protocols that make their users rich. A simple yet powerful framework.
One to three killer use-cases are all you need.
Finding the next gem token can be a challenging task, especially with the sheer number of new tokens being introduced on a daily basis.
It’s difficult to keep up with all the new projects and conduct thorough research on each one of them.
That’s why I kept this guide short and simple – it can be summarized in just 6 actionable points: