Yesterday, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) sanctioned Galois Capital Management LLC, a former registered investment advisor based in Florida that primarily invested in crypto assets. The SEC found that Galois Capital failed to comply with the custody rules under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, particularly showing significant lapses in the management of crypto assets. Specifically, Galois Capital did not ensure that the crypto assets it managed were held by qualified custodians, instead storing them on non-compliant cryptocurrency platforms, which resulted in the loss of most assets during the collapse of the FTX exchange. Additionally, Galois misled investors by providing inconsistent redemption terms.
Aiying predicts that such incidents will become increasingly common in the crypto asset management sector in the future. As crypto assets gain popularity, investment advisory firms managing such assets remain largely self-regulated due to early regulatory gaps and the rising cost of compliance. Consequently, the likelihood of black swan events or regulatory sanctions following complaints is expected to rise.
Origin and Purpose of Custody Rules
The U.S. custody rules are essentially a set of legal provisions aimed at protecting investors’ assets. These rules originated from the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, with the goal of preventing any misconduct by investment advisory firms when managing client assets. According to these rules, if an investment advisory firm has the authority to control or manage client assets, those assets must be held by a qualified custodian, such as a regulated bank or financial institution.
The core idea of the custody rules is simple: investment advisory firms must not mix client assets with their own funds, and they must manage them separately. If there is any change in client assets, the custodian is required to notify the client promptly and provide regular reports on the asset status. These measures are designed to ensure the safety of investors’ funds and prevent any losses due to advisor errors or misconduct.
Expansion to Virtual Assets
With the rise of virtual assets like Bitcoin and Ethereum, the financial markets have undergone significant changes. Due to their decentralized nature, anonymity, and price volatility, virtual assets have introduced new challenges to traditional asset management. Recognizing these changes, the SEC realized the need to expand the scope of custody rule protections to cover these emerging virtual assets.
In recent years, the SEC has made it clear that the custody rules apply not only to traditional financial assets like stocks and bonds but also to virtual assets. This means that if an investment advisory firm manages client cryptocurrencies, these assets must also be held by a qualified custodian. Qualified custodians must not only meet traditional regulatory requirements but also possess the technical capabilities to address risks specific to virtual assets, such as preventing hacking or the loss of cryptocurrencies.
The SEC and other relevant regulatory agencies in the United States have begun to pay attention to and regulate the emerging field of qualified custodians for virtual currency assets. Qualified custodians of digital assets must meet the requirements of traditional custodians while also possessing specialized capabilities to manage and protect these digital assets. The following are some key standards and requirements for qualified custodians related to digital assets:
There are currently a total of 12 institutions that have obtained custody licenses:
(Source: New York State Department of Financial Services NYDFS)
1. Background Introduction
As an international financial center, Hong Kong is gradually strengthening its regulation in the digital asset sector. With the proliferation of cryptocurrencies and blockchain technology, Hong Kong’s regulatory authorities have begun to formulate corresponding regulations to standardize the custody and trading services of crypto assets. The Trust or Company Service Provider (TCSP) license is one of the licenses that digital asset custody service providers must obtain. For more details, refer to the article “Understanding the Latest Application Policies for Virtual Asset Custody Service Providers (TCSP) in Hong Kong in 2024.“
2. Specific Requirements
3. Regulatory Authorities
4. Industry Practices
1. Background Introduction
2. Specific Requirements
3. Regulatory Authorities
4. Industry Practices
Reference information: https://www.sec.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2024-111
This article is reproduced from [AiYing Compliance], the copyright belongs to the original author [AiYing Compliance], if you have any objections to the reprint, please contact the Gate Learn team, and the team will handle it as soon as possible according to relevant procedures.
Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article represent only the author’s personal views and do not constitute any investment advice.
Other language versions of the article are translated by the Gate Learn team and are not mentioned in Gate.io, the translated article may not be reproduced, distributed or plagiarized.
Yesterday, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) sanctioned Galois Capital Management LLC, a former registered investment advisor based in Florida that primarily invested in crypto assets. The SEC found that Galois Capital failed to comply with the custody rules under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, particularly showing significant lapses in the management of crypto assets. Specifically, Galois Capital did not ensure that the crypto assets it managed were held by qualified custodians, instead storing them on non-compliant cryptocurrency platforms, which resulted in the loss of most assets during the collapse of the FTX exchange. Additionally, Galois misled investors by providing inconsistent redemption terms.
Aiying predicts that such incidents will become increasingly common in the crypto asset management sector in the future. As crypto assets gain popularity, investment advisory firms managing such assets remain largely self-regulated due to early regulatory gaps and the rising cost of compliance. Consequently, the likelihood of black swan events or regulatory sanctions following complaints is expected to rise.
Origin and Purpose of Custody Rules
The U.S. custody rules are essentially a set of legal provisions aimed at protecting investors’ assets. These rules originated from the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, with the goal of preventing any misconduct by investment advisory firms when managing client assets. According to these rules, if an investment advisory firm has the authority to control or manage client assets, those assets must be held by a qualified custodian, such as a regulated bank or financial institution.
The core idea of the custody rules is simple: investment advisory firms must not mix client assets with their own funds, and they must manage them separately. If there is any change in client assets, the custodian is required to notify the client promptly and provide regular reports on the asset status. These measures are designed to ensure the safety of investors’ funds and prevent any losses due to advisor errors or misconduct.
Expansion to Virtual Assets
With the rise of virtual assets like Bitcoin and Ethereum, the financial markets have undergone significant changes. Due to their decentralized nature, anonymity, and price volatility, virtual assets have introduced new challenges to traditional asset management. Recognizing these changes, the SEC realized the need to expand the scope of custody rule protections to cover these emerging virtual assets.
In recent years, the SEC has made it clear that the custody rules apply not only to traditional financial assets like stocks and bonds but also to virtual assets. This means that if an investment advisory firm manages client cryptocurrencies, these assets must also be held by a qualified custodian. Qualified custodians must not only meet traditional regulatory requirements but also possess the technical capabilities to address risks specific to virtual assets, such as preventing hacking or the loss of cryptocurrencies.
The SEC and other relevant regulatory agencies in the United States have begun to pay attention to and regulate the emerging field of qualified custodians for virtual currency assets. Qualified custodians of digital assets must meet the requirements of traditional custodians while also possessing specialized capabilities to manage and protect these digital assets. The following are some key standards and requirements for qualified custodians related to digital assets:
There are currently a total of 12 institutions that have obtained custody licenses:
(Source: New York State Department of Financial Services NYDFS)
1. Background Introduction
As an international financial center, Hong Kong is gradually strengthening its regulation in the digital asset sector. With the proliferation of cryptocurrencies and blockchain technology, Hong Kong’s regulatory authorities have begun to formulate corresponding regulations to standardize the custody and trading services of crypto assets. The Trust or Company Service Provider (TCSP) license is one of the licenses that digital asset custody service providers must obtain. For more details, refer to the article “Understanding the Latest Application Policies for Virtual Asset Custody Service Providers (TCSP) in Hong Kong in 2024.“
2. Specific Requirements
3. Regulatory Authorities
4. Industry Practices
1. Background Introduction
2. Specific Requirements
3. Regulatory Authorities
4. Industry Practices
Reference information: https://www.sec.gov/newsroom/press-releases/2024-111
This article is reproduced from [AiYing Compliance], the copyright belongs to the original author [AiYing Compliance], if you have any objections to the reprint, please contact the Gate Learn team, and the team will handle it as soon as possible according to relevant procedures.
Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article represent only the author’s personal views and do not constitute any investment advice.
Other language versions of the article are translated by the Gate Learn team and are not mentioned in Gate.io, the translated article may not be reproduced, distributed or plagiarized.