While the entire DeFi ecosystem suffered significantly due to the FTX collapse, Solana DeFi was particularly declared as ‘dead’ when its TVL plummeted to a mere $200 million at the beginning of 2023. It remained around $300 million until SOL prices began to rise again towards the end of October. In the last four months, it has surged to an impressive $3.3 billion TVL, primarily driven by SOL prices. A healthy stablecoin market cap of ~$2.5 billion is also a good indication of liquid capital available in the ecosystem.
Solana DeFi in a glance (as of 14th March, 2024)
Popularised last year, while TVL might be a vanity metric; DeFi velocity (Daily DEX trading volume/chain’s TVL) is a metric Solana DEXs have been truly ruling by a huge margin.
In the bear market, the phrase ‘Only Possible on Solana’ (OPOS) became a widespread rallying cry within the community, but what truly makes Solana deserving of this title? The straightforward answer lies in its low fees and high throughput.
Low fees and high throughput make possible OPOS like:
While Move chains like Aptos and Sui, also offer high throughput and low fees, these advantages may not remain exclusive as Layer 2 solutions become more affordable and parallelized EVMs like Monad emerge. However, Solana’s vibrant community and its high-caliber builders truly set it apart.
The memecoin phenomenon perfectly illustrates the combination of Community/Culture with High Throughput/Low Fees. Consider this: would you be willing to pay $100 in fees for each swap if you were ape-ing $1000 in a cat coin? Solana enables users to ape with as little as $1, supported by fast transaction speeds, seamless bridging frontends like Jupiter, efficient DEXs, and ample liquidity.
Why are Solana airdrops so hyped? It’s because Solana is home to a group of exceptionally talented builders, and who wouldn’t want to seize the opportunity to farm their potentially high FDV tokens?
Just like any DeFi ecosystem, Solana boasts a broad spectrum of sectors, with the majority of TVL contributions coming from LSTs, DEXs, Lending/Borrowing platforms, and Perps.
A good representation of Solana DeFi TVL by Vybe
Let’s dive into each DeFi category to analyze their strengths, limitations, and the opportunities that exist. We will try to proceed in chronological order, following the typical DeFi user journey – from beginner to advanced level; also giving some tips/alpha on the way.
Starting with wallets, the wallet wars have now consolidated into the three most DeFi-friendly wallets, each equipped with all the necessary features for DeFi: Backpack, Phantom, and Solflare. Phantom’s browser feature acts as an excellent discovery tool for DeFi apps and tokens.
In the interoperability space, Wormhole stands out as the dominant messaging layer, enabling the sending of messages between Solana and over 25 other chains. Wormhole supports several major bridges:
LiFi, the bridge aggregator, has also made its way into Solana, powering Phantom’s cross-chain swapper while integrating Solana into its bridging aggregator frontend — Jumper. Currently, this is powered by Allbridge, with plans to incorporate more bridges.
deBridge stands out as one of the fastest bridges with an intent-based architecture, powered by its own messaging layer. Hashflow and Carrier are two other bridges, though they are less frequently used.
Circle’s CCTP is also set to launch by the end of March 2024, with some of the aforementioned bridges as launch partners. This will enable anyone to bridge USDC in any amount with a very low fixed fee, significantly improving bridging liquidity. The launch of LayerZero is also highly anticipated in Q2; which can be a game-changer for cross-chain Apps on Solana as LayerZero has a much bigger ecosystem and community than Wormhole.
Jupiter has also developed a bridge comparator to assist users in choosing the optimal bridge. However, it only facilitates transfers from Ethereum to Solana and does not include all bridges.
User tip — Bridging to/from Solana: For Ethereum, Sui, and Aptos, use the Portal bridge. For Ethereum L2s, compare between Jumper, deBridge, and Mayan.
Solana’s DEXs have been recording peaks of $2-3 billion in daily volumes, $12 billion in weekly volumes, and $28 billion in monthly volumes – flipping Ethereum on good days and weeks. Approximately 60% of total DEX volumes are facilitated by Jupiter, the leading DEX aggregator on Solana and the largest DeFi project on the platform. Using Jupiter as a proxy for insights into DEX activity for February:
Unlike the EVM ecosystem, where Uniswap dominates, Solana’s spot DEXs remain highly competitive, with top DEXs fiercely vying for market share. Orca, which held over 50% of the market at the beginning of the year, remains the leading DEX despite a slight decline in market share. Raydium and Openbook are achieving significant volumes, particularly during periods of meme coin popularity
Fierce competition for market share between Solana DEXs (Source: Top Ledger)
Jupiter stands as the undisputed leader, not only within Solana but across the entire crypto sector, surpassing the volumes of EVM counterparts like 1inch and Matcha. Jupiter, the premier Solana aggregator, manages approximately 80% of the trade flow (after excluding bot activity). This contrasts sharply with the Ethereum mainnet, where a significant portion of trade still occurs through DEX frontends, and multiple aggregators share ~40-50% of the order flow.
Leveraging its sophisticated routing algorithm (Metis), Jupiter identifies the best prices across 30+ integrated DEXs, it also offers features like:
For developers, Jupiter provides a Payments API (allowing merchants to accept payments in any token while receiving the final amount in USDC) and a Terminal feature (enabling any dApp to incorporate swapping functionality within their interface). To date, Jupiter has facilitated over $100 billion in transaction volumes.
Prism, an OG protocol in the field, also features a DEX aggregator (doing insignificant volumes as compared to Jupiter) along with Prism Pro, a frontend for trading on Openbook. It plans to make its aggregator open-source.
Dflow emerges as a potential contender to Jupiter, created by a robust team (which secured $5.5 million in funding last year, with possibly more since then). Dflow has developed a routing algorithm akin to Jupiter’s, named Segmenter, with notable product distinctions:
Though not yet fully operational, Dflow has activated deposits and is running a points program, hinting at a possible token launch soon. Will be exciting to watch, if they manage to take any significant share away from Jupiter.
CLOBs represent the first iteration of on-chain Order Positioning Systems (OPOS). Among the inaugural major DeFi ventures on Solana was Project Serum, initiated by FTX, which introduced the first fully on-chain order book, boasting unified liquidity across the ecosystem. Project Serum (and FTX too) played a pivotal role in sparking the initial momentum for Solana’s DeFi sector, drawing numerous projects to the platform that are now considered blue chips within the Solana ecosystem. It’s important to acknowledge and give credit where it’s due.
Following the collapse of FTX, the DeFi community forked the Serum code, transforming it into a public asset and rebranding it as OpenBook. OpenBook might well be Solana’s most underappreciated public resource, maintaining daily volumes of $50-100 million, imposing no trading fees, and allowing for the creation of markets without requiring permissions. For more on Openbook — read an essay I wrote previously.
Yet, the most prominent order book on Solana at present is Phoenix built by a strong team, with daily volumes ranging between $100-150 million. It currently operates markets with permissions (with plans to transition to a permissionless model) and derives the bulk of its volume from trading pairs such as SOL/USDC (~70%), SOL/USDT (~10%), and BONK/USDC (~10%).
In comparison to OpenBook, Phoenix offers:
Root Exchange serves as another user interface built atop Phoenix, providing enhanced functionality for limit orders.
Despite the innovation of order books, the top four Solana AMMs continue to dominate the majority of trading volumes.
Fluxbeam is the sole AMM specializing in token extensions, poised to launch its launchpad soon. Other AMMs like Invariant and Saber (now SaberDAO) may not be as actively developed but still account for significant volumes.
Backpack Exchange — A centralized exchange developed by the team behind Backpack and Mad Lads. It is regulated under Dubai’s VARA, with additional licenses forthcoming. The exchange currently offers spot trading and plans to introduce margin trading, derivatives, and cross-collateral options soon. It has successfully attracted over $70 million in deposits, spurred by anticipation of a potential snapshot.
Cube Exchange — Another centralized exchange, created by former members of the Solana Labs team. It boasts a latency of just 0.2 ms, which is lower than that of Binance (5 ms). The exchange maintains an off-chain order book, while settlements are executed on CubeNet, a meta-L2 blockchain that is reportedly a fork of SVM.
My Predictions:
Given the token launch frenzy, the Solana ecosystem has two token launch tools:
Jupiter’s LFG Launchpad — The top DeFi project on Solana has also established a launchpad, capitalizing on its existing ecosystem and community:
Projects like Zeus and Sharky are among the first to be launched via Jupiter.
Assets (or Tokens) on Solana can be broadly categorized into:
Memecoins are culture on financial steroids. They serve as the lifeblood of DEXs on Solana and have garnered significant attention. Many speculate that we might be experiencing a Memecoin Supercycle, with Solana leading the charge.
Solana has become synonymous with memecoins due to:
Here’s the typical journey of a memecoin enthusiast:
The adage “bet where the retail is” holds true — and the retail degens are on Solana.
All trending tokens are Solana memecoins on DEXSCREENER
My predictions:
User Tips — Portfolio Trackers:
Solana supports three major portfolio trackers (or address stalkers): Step Finance, Sonar Watch, and Asset Dash. While Sonar Watch excels with DeFi integrations, Asset Dash and Step Finance are preferable for those seeking mobile-friendly options and better NFT support. For analyzing or monitoring any wallet, these portfolio trackers, along with Phantom’s watch wallet feature, can be incredibly useful. From the two primary explorers, Solscan and SolanaFM, SolanaFM is much more advanced in terms of transaction analysis.
Solana now boasts a diverse array of fiat-backed stablecoins.
🇺🇸 USD – USDC, USDT, USDP, USDY, ZUSD
🇪🇺 EUR – EURC, EUROe, VEUR
🇯🇵 GYEN, 🇨🇦 QCAD, 🇨🇭 VCHF, 🇹🇷 TRYB, 🇮🇸 ISKT, 🇧🇷 BRZ, 🇲🇽 Etherfuse CETES, 🇳🇬 NGNC
Currently, Solana has approximately $2.5 billion in stablecoin market cap, with USDC (67.5%) and USDT (31.5%) commanding the majority of the market share, followed by a long tail of other stablecoins each with a market cap of less than $10 million. Despite the recent launch of many fiat-backed stablecoins, aside from USDT and USDC, most others face challenges with low liquidity and limited DeFi integrations. To address this, Meteora has introduced FX Pools (currently only for the EURC - USDC pool with a TVL of $20K), which is still in its nascent stages but represents a step in the right direction.
UXD (backed by overcollateralized lending positions, real-world assets, and delta-neutral positions) and USDH (CDP-backed) are the two decentralized stablecoins on Solana.
The Case for an On-chain Foreign Exchange (FX) Market
The FX market is huge, with over $6 trillion in daily volume. The availability of fiat-backed stablecoins with adequate liquidity could pave the way for on-chain spot FX markets through order books and AMMs. Envision a scenario where a merchant can accept payments in USDX and instantly convert them to YENX, with Jupiter routing the transaction through multiple liquidity venues. Someone will sooner or later build a spot Forex trading platform on Solana.
There are two LST-backed pseudo-stablecoins as well to be launched on Solana — MarginFi’s YBX and Jupiter’s SUSD. These are essentially CDP stablecoins but utilize LST as collateral (comparable to Ethereum’s eUSD by Lybra and mkUSD by Prisma).
My Predictions:
User Tip — Not all stablecoins are created equal. Fiat-backed stablecoins are generally the safest, while other DeFi stablecoins, often termed “Synthetic Dollars,” carry inherent DeFi risks and are best suited for DeFi applications. Always verify liquidity and redeemability before holding any significant amount of stablecoins.
In recent efforts to scale Bitcoin, several projects have embarked on creating Bitcoin <> Solana interoperability solutions to enable seamless Bitcoin usage via Solana:
These initiatives are still in their infancy and have yet to fully launch. The Threshold Network‘s tBTC also provides a tokenized version of Bitcoin on Solana, facilitated by Wormhole Crypto.
For more insights and predictions, check out my thread on the Bitcoin x Solana thesis!
Tokenizing RWA (Real World Assets) brings off-chain financial assets on-chain. For example, real estate, private credit, T-bills, green bonds, gold, and other commodities.
Apart from stablecoin, Solana hosts a wide range of RWAs, ranging from:
My Predictions:
I’ve composed a comprehensive essay on Real World Assets, which encapsulates all RWAs on Solana along with my thesis.
On Solana, ~400k wallets stake their SOL. As an asset class, liquid staking tokens (LSTs) contribute the most to the protocol’s total value locked (TVL). Take any lending/borrowing protocol, and you will see LSTs dominate the TVL. However, Solana’s LST adoption remains low at 4-5% of the total SOL supply, compared to Ethereum, where the staking rate is an impressive ~24%. While most LSTs offer similar yields, it is the higher secondary market liquidity and broader utility in DeFi that make them stand out. On DeFi integrations, Money markets dominate, with platforms like Solend, Kamino, and Marginfi becoming central hubs for LST activity, partly propelled by the anticipation of an airdrop.
On Solana, all LSTs generate yield, meaning their value increases as yields accrue. In contrast, popular Ethereum LSTs like Lido’s stETH undergo daily rebasing (that means the number of stETH in your wallet keeps increasing, while the price remains roughly the same as ETH).
Jito Boosted Yields = Standard Staking Yields + MEV Rewards
Jito’s Stakenet: When we stake SOL using any LST solution, the staking program is operated by a hot wallet managed by an off-chain bot that decides to:
Recently, Jito Labs suspended its mempool services provided by the Jito Block Engine due to an increase in sandwich attacks. The decision has sparked mixed reactions within the community, with some appreciating Jito’s proactive stance, while critics argue it could lead to private deals and potentially a new, private mempool being developed in response.
Tweet Link While LSTs represent one use case, StakeNet can be particularly interesting for scenarios such as restaking networks, liquid restaking protocols, oracle networks, and more. In these instances, StakeNet can autonomously allocate assets across a decentralized network of Actively Validated Services (AVS) and high-performance node operators. It combines the best of both worlds: automation (by moving processes on-chain) and governance (allowing configuration parameters to be set via governance).
Numerous other LSTs exist, operated by solo validators, with a few attempting to differentiate themselves. For example, LaineSOL and CompassSOL have been offering higher staking rewards with the aid of MEV. For a comparison of APYs and active stakes, check out this list.
LSTs on Solana confront liquidity challenges, which is why there are only three major LSTs (JitoSOL, mSOL, and bSOL). Smaller LSTs struggle with the issue of fragmented liquidity – sanctum solves this.
Sanctum - Unified LST liquidity:
An interesting project by one of the OG teams helped Solana Labs build the SPL stake pool program and launched the first SPL stake pool, Socean.
\To solve liquidity, Sanctum built two major products:
Why would a validator choose LST over vanilla staking?
More DeFi integration, potentially boosting yields for stakers and the potential to launch a token and kickstart the entire ecosystem.
Think of Sanctum as Amazon for LSTs, just like:
1) You can buy/sell products on Amazon — you can buy/sell LSTs for SOL (Sanctum Reserve and Router)
2) Launch your own product on Amazon, while Amazon takes care of end-to-end delivery — you can launch your own LST while Sanctum takes care of liquidity (Sanctum LSTs)
3) Amazon’s own brand — Sanctum has launched it’s own LST (Sanctum Infinity)
My Predictions:
Restaking is huge on Ethereum, primarily due to AVS (rollups/appchains/bridges) that require economic security and the same doesn’t translate to Solana — as it doesn’t have a modular thesis yet.
However, Solana can still have AVS (Actively Validated Services) as anything that requires distributed validation can use this:
An early-stage team called Cambrian is also exploring this direction. Picaso is another solution exploring SOL LST restaking to secure Mantis, a cross-chain intent settlement protocol. Apart from that, Jito is another team, which is well-suited to build anything around Restaking via stakenet.
Subscribe
Solana hosts three major Money Markets utilizing a Peer-to-pool model, adhering to floating (variable) rates and analogous interest rate mechanisms. They operate based on a utilization-based interest rate model, wherein the yields are contingent on the utilization ratio (the proportion of supplied capital that is lent out), with the formula: supply rate = borrow rate utilization ratio (1 – reserve factor). The ‘reserve factor’ represents a percentage of capital supplied by lenders on which they do not earn interest; instead, this interest benefits the protocol. The utilization rate largely hinges on the system’s appetite for leverage.
All three markets feature an active points program, with MarginFi and Kamino planning to launch tokens soon:
Kamino has developed products like Multiply and Long/Short, which are one-click vault products designed for leveraged yields through looping. Kamino features a comprehensive risk dashboard for examining all types of risks alongside various scenario analyses. Uniquely, Kamino has implemented Auto-deleveraging, where borrowers are deleveraged (i.e., partial unwinding of positions) in response to market conditions to prevent bad debt.
While all protocols employ similar lending/borrowing mechanisms, they each adopt distinct approaches to risk management parameters, such as Price Oracles, liquidations, risk engines, and so forth. Given the high demand for leverage, the rates have surged significantly with USDC now yielding 30-40%!
On the trading front, there are two perps — Drift and Mango — with lending/borrowing features that can also serve as a margin for trading.
Lending and Borrowing Platforms on Solana (Source: Flexlend)
Yield aggregators generally aggregate two types of yields:
My Predictions:
Note on Oracles:
Oracles not just bring off-chain data on-chain, but are very criticial for the DeFi infrastructure as all calculations rely on the orcale price feeds. Pyth (permissioned - only verified publishers can publish) is a dominant player being the first choice of integration for most players, while Switchboard (permissionless - can have custom price feeds) is another player which serves as an alternate or backup oracle for most DeFi players.
Perps are the highest PMF derivative product in Crypto and like every chain, Solana has a wide range of perp protocols:
Most perp DEXs on Solana have an active points program, which has led to a huge surge in volumes.
Drawing significant inspiration from GMX, Solana boasts two operational perpetual DEXs — Jupiter and Flash. Both are based on a novel LP-to-trader model, offering up to 100x leverage. They utilize LP pool liquidity (FLP for Flash and JLP for Jupiter) and oracles, ensuring zero price impact, zero slippage, and deep liquidity. Users can open and close positions in one simple step, eliminating the need for additional accounts or deposits. However, there are notable differences:
Nevertheless, network effects are powerful, as Jupiter perps are integrated into the Jupiter Frontend, the most visited DeFi site, giving Jupiter perps a significant advantage — the numbers speak for themselves. Jupiter achieving more volume than all other perps on Solana combined validates that crypto frontends can cross-sell anything (even products that may not be the best) — generating fees and, hence, accruing value!
Parcl – An intriguing perpetual DEX that enables one to go long or short on real estate indexes for cities like Las Vegas and Paris. The price feed oracle for this perpetual DEX is Parcl Labs, the company behind the Parcl platform. Despite attracting a significant amount of TVL, it does very little organic volume.
One of the other OPOS features, Solana is the only chain running completely on-chain perp order books, while most other chains have off-chain order books (as a sidechain/appchain/rollup).
Drift Protocol — Originally built upon the virtually automated market maker (vAMM) model, pioneered by Perp Protocol, Drift v2 now follows a unique mechanism “Liquidity Trifecta”, composed of 3 mechanisms:
Drift launching pre-token launch perps can be an interesting marketing play, however, the volumes would still be low as we have seen from Hyperliquid and Aevo pre-listing markets.
Fully-on chain orderbooks like:
Solana Perp DEXs still lag their Ethereum counterparts by a significant margin, particularly the Hybrid DEXs (Off-chain order book matching with on-chain settlement) like Aevo, Hyperliquid, Vertex, and dYdX - which are consistently the top 4 perp DEXs. However, Jupiter has been recently doing high volumes, placing it in the top 5 perp DEXs in good days.
My Predictions:
Structured Products and on-chain derivatives (aside from Perps) were all the rage during the previous bull run, with many innovative products like DeFi Option Vaults ( Katana and Friktion) launching on Solana. We can expect a similar frenzy to return as we are on the cusp of the bull market.
On-chain options are challenging; however, they are making a strong comeback, with projects like Aevo experiencing a recent surge in premium volume of approximately $500K, while notional volume reaches $1-2 billion. This resurgence is followed by projects like Lyra, Typus, and Premia.
On Solana, there are two very strong teams building on-chain options:
https://youtu.be/9oeM-Fl-LsM
Regarding structured vaults, Cega is another OG product, offering various types of vaults like Pure Options Strategy, Bond + Options Strategy, Leveraged Options Strategy, and Dual Currency Vaults. It supports deposits and withdrawals from Solana, has a TVL of ~$13 million, and has transacted more than $380 million.
Yield Enhancers like Superstake SOL — assist in earning leveraged yield on LSTs through recursive borrowing/lending of SOL, powered by Drift.
Dual Finance – offers options infrastructure, but not for speculative use-cases; instead, it serves as incentive liquidity infrastructure for Web3 Communities. By using Staking Options, enables projects to offer lockup rewards in the form of options. Dual Finance allows projects to reward participation in their ecosystem (e.g., using their protocols or providing liquidity) by granting users options on their native tokens. For example, BONK has staking options (lockup rewards in the form of options) to incentivize long-term token holding and community engagement.
Amulet — is a yield/insurance protocol supporting Solana, featuring various products like AmuVaults, AmuShield, and AmuVerse. Symmetry is another platform for creating, automating, managing, and tracking on-chain funds.
My Predictions:
User tip — Options are risky and should only be explored once you fully understand them. Nonetheless, since most projects are still in their early stages and tokenless, if you’re an options trader, they’re worth considering.
Broadly, I expect the following DeFi trends to unfold:
As both ends of the barbell of Solana DeFi have been developed, we will see more innovation happening in the middle! A massive unlock is about to happen, catering primarily to the utilization of yield-bearing assets and yield trading within the ecosystem.
The Solana DeFi ecosystem is rapidly growing; the blue chips have done a tremendous job in bringing Solana DeFi to its current state — it’s now time for new DeFi protocols to emerge. The biggest strength of Solana lies in its composability. While composability is a double-edged sword from a risk perspective, it offers early-stage DeFi protocols tremendous leverage to grow on the shoulders of giants.
Focus on innovations and design mechanisms that are ‘only possible on Solana’! The infrastructure is finally at a place where a high scale of activity can be sustained — so many DeFi primitives that previously failed due to being too early are now viable again.
This was just part 1 of the Solana DeFi series – stay tuned for Part 2, “What to Build on Solana DeFi,” which will delve deeper and focus on giving builders insights into trends to watch out for, along with in-depth ideas.
Subscribe if you don’t want to miss Part 2.
Subscribe; you won’t regret :)
Subscribe
Feel free to contact me at Yash Agarwal (@yashhsm on Twitter) for any suggestions or if you have any opinions. If you find this even slightly insightful, please share it — justifies my weeks of effort and gets more eyeballs :)
Special thanks to Sitesh (Superteam), Kash (Superteam), Krish (Timeswap), Akshay (Superteam), Ata (PsyFi), and Mikey (Orca) who reviewed and provided insights at different stages of the draft.
This article is reprinted from [Blog], Forward the Original Title‘State of Solana DeFi 2024’, All copyrights belong to the original author [YASH AGARWAL]. If there are objections to this reprint, please contact the Gate Learn team, and they will handle it promptly.
Liability Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not constitute any investment advice.
Translations of the article into other languages are done by the Gate Learn team. Unless mentioned, copying, distributing, or plagiarizing the translated articles is prohibited.
While the entire DeFi ecosystem suffered significantly due to the FTX collapse, Solana DeFi was particularly declared as ‘dead’ when its TVL plummeted to a mere $200 million at the beginning of 2023. It remained around $300 million until SOL prices began to rise again towards the end of October. In the last four months, it has surged to an impressive $3.3 billion TVL, primarily driven by SOL prices. A healthy stablecoin market cap of ~$2.5 billion is also a good indication of liquid capital available in the ecosystem.
Solana DeFi in a glance (as of 14th March, 2024)
Popularised last year, while TVL might be a vanity metric; DeFi velocity (Daily DEX trading volume/chain’s TVL) is a metric Solana DEXs have been truly ruling by a huge margin.
In the bear market, the phrase ‘Only Possible on Solana’ (OPOS) became a widespread rallying cry within the community, but what truly makes Solana deserving of this title? The straightforward answer lies in its low fees and high throughput.
Low fees and high throughput make possible OPOS like:
While Move chains like Aptos and Sui, also offer high throughput and low fees, these advantages may not remain exclusive as Layer 2 solutions become more affordable and parallelized EVMs like Monad emerge. However, Solana’s vibrant community and its high-caliber builders truly set it apart.
The memecoin phenomenon perfectly illustrates the combination of Community/Culture with High Throughput/Low Fees. Consider this: would you be willing to pay $100 in fees for each swap if you were ape-ing $1000 in a cat coin? Solana enables users to ape with as little as $1, supported by fast transaction speeds, seamless bridging frontends like Jupiter, efficient DEXs, and ample liquidity.
Why are Solana airdrops so hyped? It’s because Solana is home to a group of exceptionally talented builders, and who wouldn’t want to seize the opportunity to farm their potentially high FDV tokens?
Just like any DeFi ecosystem, Solana boasts a broad spectrum of sectors, with the majority of TVL contributions coming from LSTs, DEXs, Lending/Borrowing platforms, and Perps.
A good representation of Solana DeFi TVL by Vybe
Let’s dive into each DeFi category to analyze their strengths, limitations, and the opportunities that exist. We will try to proceed in chronological order, following the typical DeFi user journey – from beginner to advanced level; also giving some tips/alpha on the way.
Starting with wallets, the wallet wars have now consolidated into the three most DeFi-friendly wallets, each equipped with all the necessary features for DeFi: Backpack, Phantom, and Solflare. Phantom’s browser feature acts as an excellent discovery tool for DeFi apps and tokens.
In the interoperability space, Wormhole stands out as the dominant messaging layer, enabling the sending of messages between Solana and over 25 other chains. Wormhole supports several major bridges:
LiFi, the bridge aggregator, has also made its way into Solana, powering Phantom’s cross-chain swapper while integrating Solana into its bridging aggregator frontend — Jumper. Currently, this is powered by Allbridge, with plans to incorporate more bridges.
deBridge stands out as one of the fastest bridges with an intent-based architecture, powered by its own messaging layer. Hashflow and Carrier are two other bridges, though they are less frequently used.
Circle’s CCTP is also set to launch by the end of March 2024, with some of the aforementioned bridges as launch partners. This will enable anyone to bridge USDC in any amount with a very low fixed fee, significantly improving bridging liquidity. The launch of LayerZero is also highly anticipated in Q2; which can be a game-changer for cross-chain Apps on Solana as LayerZero has a much bigger ecosystem and community than Wormhole.
Jupiter has also developed a bridge comparator to assist users in choosing the optimal bridge. However, it only facilitates transfers from Ethereum to Solana and does not include all bridges.
User tip — Bridging to/from Solana: For Ethereum, Sui, and Aptos, use the Portal bridge. For Ethereum L2s, compare between Jumper, deBridge, and Mayan.
Solana’s DEXs have been recording peaks of $2-3 billion in daily volumes, $12 billion in weekly volumes, and $28 billion in monthly volumes – flipping Ethereum on good days and weeks. Approximately 60% of total DEX volumes are facilitated by Jupiter, the leading DEX aggregator on Solana and the largest DeFi project on the platform. Using Jupiter as a proxy for insights into DEX activity for February:
Unlike the EVM ecosystem, where Uniswap dominates, Solana’s spot DEXs remain highly competitive, with top DEXs fiercely vying for market share. Orca, which held over 50% of the market at the beginning of the year, remains the leading DEX despite a slight decline in market share. Raydium and Openbook are achieving significant volumes, particularly during periods of meme coin popularity
Fierce competition for market share between Solana DEXs (Source: Top Ledger)
Jupiter stands as the undisputed leader, not only within Solana but across the entire crypto sector, surpassing the volumes of EVM counterparts like 1inch and Matcha. Jupiter, the premier Solana aggregator, manages approximately 80% of the trade flow (after excluding bot activity). This contrasts sharply with the Ethereum mainnet, where a significant portion of trade still occurs through DEX frontends, and multiple aggregators share ~40-50% of the order flow.
Leveraging its sophisticated routing algorithm (Metis), Jupiter identifies the best prices across 30+ integrated DEXs, it also offers features like:
For developers, Jupiter provides a Payments API (allowing merchants to accept payments in any token while receiving the final amount in USDC) and a Terminal feature (enabling any dApp to incorporate swapping functionality within their interface). To date, Jupiter has facilitated over $100 billion in transaction volumes.
Prism, an OG protocol in the field, also features a DEX aggregator (doing insignificant volumes as compared to Jupiter) along with Prism Pro, a frontend for trading on Openbook. It plans to make its aggregator open-source.
Dflow emerges as a potential contender to Jupiter, created by a robust team (which secured $5.5 million in funding last year, with possibly more since then). Dflow has developed a routing algorithm akin to Jupiter’s, named Segmenter, with notable product distinctions:
Though not yet fully operational, Dflow has activated deposits and is running a points program, hinting at a possible token launch soon. Will be exciting to watch, if they manage to take any significant share away from Jupiter.
CLOBs represent the first iteration of on-chain Order Positioning Systems (OPOS). Among the inaugural major DeFi ventures on Solana was Project Serum, initiated by FTX, which introduced the first fully on-chain order book, boasting unified liquidity across the ecosystem. Project Serum (and FTX too) played a pivotal role in sparking the initial momentum for Solana’s DeFi sector, drawing numerous projects to the platform that are now considered blue chips within the Solana ecosystem. It’s important to acknowledge and give credit where it’s due.
Following the collapse of FTX, the DeFi community forked the Serum code, transforming it into a public asset and rebranding it as OpenBook. OpenBook might well be Solana’s most underappreciated public resource, maintaining daily volumes of $50-100 million, imposing no trading fees, and allowing for the creation of markets without requiring permissions. For more on Openbook — read an essay I wrote previously.
Yet, the most prominent order book on Solana at present is Phoenix built by a strong team, with daily volumes ranging between $100-150 million. It currently operates markets with permissions (with plans to transition to a permissionless model) and derives the bulk of its volume from trading pairs such as SOL/USDC (~70%), SOL/USDT (~10%), and BONK/USDC (~10%).
In comparison to OpenBook, Phoenix offers:
Root Exchange serves as another user interface built atop Phoenix, providing enhanced functionality for limit orders.
Despite the innovation of order books, the top four Solana AMMs continue to dominate the majority of trading volumes.
Fluxbeam is the sole AMM specializing in token extensions, poised to launch its launchpad soon. Other AMMs like Invariant and Saber (now SaberDAO) may not be as actively developed but still account for significant volumes.
Backpack Exchange — A centralized exchange developed by the team behind Backpack and Mad Lads. It is regulated under Dubai’s VARA, with additional licenses forthcoming. The exchange currently offers spot trading and plans to introduce margin trading, derivatives, and cross-collateral options soon. It has successfully attracted over $70 million in deposits, spurred by anticipation of a potential snapshot.
Cube Exchange — Another centralized exchange, created by former members of the Solana Labs team. It boasts a latency of just 0.2 ms, which is lower than that of Binance (5 ms). The exchange maintains an off-chain order book, while settlements are executed on CubeNet, a meta-L2 blockchain that is reportedly a fork of SVM.
My Predictions:
Given the token launch frenzy, the Solana ecosystem has two token launch tools:
Jupiter’s LFG Launchpad — The top DeFi project on Solana has also established a launchpad, capitalizing on its existing ecosystem and community:
Projects like Zeus and Sharky are among the first to be launched via Jupiter.
Assets (or Tokens) on Solana can be broadly categorized into:
Memecoins are culture on financial steroids. They serve as the lifeblood of DEXs on Solana and have garnered significant attention. Many speculate that we might be experiencing a Memecoin Supercycle, with Solana leading the charge.
Solana has become synonymous with memecoins due to:
Here’s the typical journey of a memecoin enthusiast:
The adage “bet where the retail is” holds true — and the retail degens are on Solana.
All trending tokens are Solana memecoins on DEXSCREENER
My predictions:
User Tips — Portfolio Trackers:
Solana supports three major portfolio trackers (or address stalkers): Step Finance, Sonar Watch, and Asset Dash. While Sonar Watch excels with DeFi integrations, Asset Dash and Step Finance are preferable for those seeking mobile-friendly options and better NFT support. For analyzing or monitoring any wallet, these portfolio trackers, along with Phantom’s watch wallet feature, can be incredibly useful. From the two primary explorers, Solscan and SolanaFM, SolanaFM is much more advanced in terms of transaction analysis.
Solana now boasts a diverse array of fiat-backed stablecoins.
🇺🇸 USD – USDC, USDT, USDP, USDY, ZUSD
🇪🇺 EUR – EURC, EUROe, VEUR
🇯🇵 GYEN, 🇨🇦 QCAD, 🇨🇭 VCHF, 🇹🇷 TRYB, 🇮🇸 ISKT, 🇧🇷 BRZ, 🇲🇽 Etherfuse CETES, 🇳🇬 NGNC
Currently, Solana has approximately $2.5 billion in stablecoin market cap, with USDC (67.5%) and USDT (31.5%) commanding the majority of the market share, followed by a long tail of other stablecoins each with a market cap of less than $10 million. Despite the recent launch of many fiat-backed stablecoins, aside from USDT and USDC, most others face challenges with low liquidity and limited DeFi integrations. To address this, Meteora has introduced FX Pools (currently only for the EURC - USDC pool with a TVL of $20K), which is still in its nascent stages but represents a step in the right direction.
UXD (backed by overcollateralized lending positions, real-world assets, and delta-neutral positions) and USDH (CDP-backed) are the two decentralized stablecoins on Solana.
The Case for an On-chain Foreign Exchange (FX) Market
The FX market is huge, with over $6 trillion in daily volume. The availability of fiat-backed stablecoins with adequate liquidity could pave the way for on-chain spot FX markets through order books and AMMs. Envision a scenario where a merchant can accept payments in USDX and instantly convert them to YENX, with Jupiter routing the transaction through multiple liquidity venues. Someone will sooner or later build a spot Forex trading platform on Solana.
There are two LST-backed pseudo-stablecoins as well to be launched on Solana — MarginFi’s YBX and Jupiter’s SUSD. These are essentially CDP stablecoins but utilize LST as collateral (comparable to Ethereum’s eUSD by Lybra and mkUSD by Prisma).
My Predictions:
User Tip — Not all stablecoins are created equal. Fiat-backed stablecoins are generally the safest, while other DeFi stablecoins, often termed “Synthetic Dollars,” carry inherent DeFi risks and are best suited for DeFi applications. Always verify liquidity and redeemability before holding any significant amount of stablecoins.
In recent efforts to scale Bitcoin, several projects have embarked on creating Bitcoin <> Solana interoperability solutions to enable seamless Bitcoin usage via Solana:
These initiatives are still in their infancy and have yet to fully launch. The Threshold Network‘s tBTC also provides a tokenized version of Bitcoin on Solana, facilitated by Wormhole Crypto.
For more insights and predictions, check out my thread on the Bitcoin x Solana thesis!
Tokenizing RWA (Real World Assets) brings off-chain financial assets on-chain. For example, real estate, private credit, T-bills, green bonds, gold, and other commodities.
Apart from stablecoin, Solana hosts a wide range of RWAs, ranging from:
My Predictions:
I’ve composed a comprehensive essay on Real World Assets, which encapsulates all RWAs on Solana along with my thesis.
On Solana, ~400k wallets stake their SOL. As an asset class, liquid staking tokens (LSTs) contribute the most to the protocol’s total value locked (TVL). Take any lending/borrowing protocol, and you will see LSTs dominate the TVL. However, Solana’s LST adoption remains low at 4-5% of the total SOL supply, compared to Ethereum, where the staking rate is an impressive ~24%. While most LSTs offer similar yields, it is the higher secondary market liquidity and broader utility in DeFi that make them stand out. On DeFi integrations, Money markets dominate, with platforms like Solend, Kamino, and Marginfi becoming central hubs for LST activity, partly propelled by the anticipation of an airdrop.
On Solana, all LSTs generate yield, meaning their value increases as yields accrue. In contrast, popular Ethereum LSTs like Lido’s stETH undergo daily rebasing (that means the number of stETH in your wallet keeps increasing, while the price remains roughly the same as ETH).
Jito Boosted Yields = Standard Staking Yields + MEV Rewards
Jito’s Stakenet: When we stake SOL using any LST solution, the staking program is operated by a hot wallet managed by an off-chain bot that decides to:
Recently, Jito Labs suspended its mempool services provided by the Jito Block Engine due to an increase in sandwich attacks. The decision has sparked mixed reactions within the community, with some appreciating Jito’s proactive stance, while critics argue it could lead to private deals and potentially a new, private mempool being developed in response.
Tweet Link While LSTs represent one use case, StakeNet can be particularly interesting for scenarios such as restaking networks, liquid restaking protocols, oracle networks, and more. In these instances, StakeNet can autonomously allocate assets across a decentralized network of Actively Validated Services (AVS) and high-performance node operators. It combines the best of both worlds: automation (by moving processes on-chain) and governance (allowing configuration parameters to be set via governance).
Numerous other LSTs exist, operated by solo validators, with a few attempting to differentiate themselves. For example, LaineSOL and CompassSOL have been offering higher staking rewards with the aid of MEV. For a comparison of APYs and active stakes, check out this list.
LSTs on Solana confront liquidity challenges, which is why there are only three major LSTs (JitoSOL, mSOL, and bSOL). Smaller LSTs struggle with the issue of fragmented liquidity – sanctum solves this.
Sanctum - Unified LST liquidity:
An interesting project by one of the OG teams helped Solana Labs build the SPL stake pool program and launched the first SPL stake pool, Socean.
\To solve liquidity, Sanctum built two major products:
Why would a validator choose LST over vanilla staking?
More DeFi integration, potentially boosting yields for stakers and the potential to launch a token and kickstart the entire ecosystem.
Think of Sanctum as Amazon for LSTs, just like:
1) You can buy/sell products on Amazon — you can buy/sell LSTs for SOL (Sanctum Reserve and Router)
2) Launch your own product on Amazon, while Amazon takes care of end-to-end delivery — you can launch your own LST while Sanctum takes care of liquidity (Sanctum LSTs)
3) Amazon’s own brand — Sanctum has launched it’s own LST (Sanctum Infinity)
My Predictions:
Restaking is huge on Ethereum, primarily due to AVS (rollups/appchains/bridges) that require economic security and the same doesn’t translate to Solana — as it doesn’t have a modular thesis yet.
However, Solana can still have AVS (Actively Validated Services) as anything that requires distributed validation can use this:
An early-stage team called Cambrian is also exploring this direction. Picaso is another solution exploring SOL LST restaking to secure Mantis, a cross-chain intent settlement protocol. Apart from that, Jito is another team, which is well-suited to build anything around Restaking via stakenet.
Subscribe
Solana hosts three major Money Markets utilizing a Peer-to-pool model, adhering to floating (variable) rates and analogous interest rate mechanisms. They operate based on a utilization-based interest rate model, wherein the yields are contingent on the utilization ratio (the proportion of supplied capital that is lent out), with the formula: supply rate = borrow rate utilization ratio (1 – reserve factor). The ‘reserve factor’ represents a percentage of capital supplied by lenders on which they do not earn interest; instead, this interest benefits the protocol. The utilization rate largely hinges on the system’s appetite for leverage.
All three markets feature an active points program, with MarginFi and Kamino planning to launch tokens soon:
Kamino has developed products like Multiply and Long/Short, which are one-click vault products designed for leveraged yields through looping. Kamino features a comprehensive risk dashboard for examining all types of risks alongside various scenario analyses. Uniquely, Kamino has implemented Auto-deleveraging, where borrowers are deleveraged (i.e., partial unwinding of positions) in response to market conditions to prevent bad debt.
While all protocols employ similar lending/borrowing mechanisms, they each adopt distinct approaches to risk management parameters, such as Price Oracles, liquidations, risk engines, and so forth. Given the high demand for leverage, the rates have surged significantly with USDC now yielding 30-40%!
On the trading front, there are two perps — Drift and Mango — with lending/borrowing features that can also serve as a margin for trading.
Lending and Borrowing Platforms on Solana (Source: Flexlend)
Yield aggregators generally aggregate two types of yields:
My Predictions:
Note on Oracles:
Oracles not just bring off-chain data on-chain, but are very criticial for the DeFi infrastructure as all calculations rely on the orcale price feeds. Pyth (permissioned - only verified publishers can publish) is a dominant player being the first choice of integration for most players, while Switchboard (permissionless - can have custom price feeds) is another player which serves as an alternate or backup oracle for most DeFi players.
Perps are the highest PMF derivative product in Crypto and like every chain, Solana has a wide range of perp protocols:
Most perp DEXs on Solana have an active points program, which has led to a huge surge in volumes.
Drawing significant inspiration from GMX, Solana boasts two operational perpetual DEXs — Jupiter and Flash. Both are based on a novel LP-to-trader model, offering up to 100x leverage. They utilize LP pool liquidity (FLP for Flash and JLP for Jupiter) and oracles, ensuring zero price impact, zero slippage, and deep liquidity. Users can open and close positions in one simple step, eliminating the need for additional accounts or deposits. However, there are notable differences:
Nevertheless, network effects are powerful, as Jupiter perps are integrated into the Jupiter Frontend, the most visited DeFi site, giving Jupiter perps a significant advantage — the numbers speak for themselves. Jupiter achieving more volume than all other perps on Solana combined validates that crypto frontends can cross-sell anything (even products that may not be the best) — generating fees and, hence, accruing value!
Parcl – An intriguing perpetual DEX that enables one to go long or short on real estate indexes for cities like Las Vegas and Paris. The price feed oracle for this perpetual DEX is Parcl Labs, the company behind the Parcl platform. Despite attracting a significant amount of TVL, it does very little organic volume.
One of the other OPOS features, Solana is the only chain running completely on-chain perp order books, while most other chains have off-chain order books (as a sidechain/appchain/rollup).
Drift Protocol — Originally built upon the virtually automated market maker (vAMM) model, pioneered by Perp Protocol, Drift v2 now follows a unique mechanism “Liquidity Trifecta”, composed of 3 mechanisms:
Drift launching pre-token launch perps can be an interesting marketing play, however, the volumes would still be low as we have seen from Hyperliquid and Aevo pre-listing markets.
Fully-on chain orderbooks like:
Solana Perp DEXs still lag their Ethereum counterparts by a significant margin, particularly the Hybrid DEXs (Off-chain order book matching with on-chain settlement) like Aevo, Hyperliquid, Vertex, and dYdX - which are consistently the top 4 perp DEXs. However, Jupiter has been recently doing high volumes, placing it in the top 5 perp DEXs in good days.
My Predictions:
Structured Products and on-chain derivatives (aside from Perps) were all the rage during the previous bull run, with many innovative products like DeFi Option Vaults ( Katana and Friktion) launching on Solana. We can expect a similar frenzy to return as we are on the cusp of the bull market.
On-chain options are challenging; however, they are making a strong comeback, with projects like Aevo experiencing a recent surge in premium volume of approximately $500K, while notional volume reaches $1-2 billion. This resurgence is followed by projects like Lyra, Typus, and Premia.
On Solana, there are two very strong teams building on-chain options:
https://youtu.be/9oeM-Fl-LsM
Regarding structured vaults, Cega is another OG product, offering various types of vaults like Pure Options Strategy, Bond + Options Strategy, Leveraged Options Strategy, and Dual Currency Vaults. It supports deposits and withdrawals from Solana, has a TVL of ~$13 million, and has transacted more than $380 million.
Yield Enhancers like Superstake SOL — assist in earning leveraged yield on LSTs through recursive borrowing/lending of SOL, powered by Drift.
Dual Finance – offers options infrastructure, but not for speculative use-cases; instead, it serves as incentive liquidity infrastructure for Web3 Communities. By using Staking Options, enables projects to offer lockup rewards in the form of options. Dual Finance allows projects to reward participation in their ecosystem (e.g., using their protocols or providing liquidity) by granting users options on their native tokens. For example, BONK has staking options (lockup rewards in the form of options) to incentivize long-term token holding and community engagement.
Amulet — is a yield/insurance protocol supporting Solana, featuring various products like AmuVaults, AmuShield, and AmuVerse. Symmetry is another platform for creating, automating, managing, and tracking on-chain funds.
My Predictions:
User tip — Options are risky and should only be explored once you fully understand them. Nonetheless, since most projects are still in their early stages and tokenless, if you’re an options trader, they’re worth considering.
Broadly, I expect the following DeFi trends to unfold:
As both ends of the barbell of Solana DeFi have been developed, we will see more innovation happening in the middle! A massive unlock is about to happen, catering primarily to the utilization of yield-bearing assets and yield trading within the ecosystem.
The Solana DeFi ecosystem is rapidly growing; the blue chips have done a tremendous job in bringing Solana DeFi to its current state — it’s now time for new DeFi protocols to emerge. The biggest strength of Solana lies in its composability. While composability is a double-edged sword from a risk perspective, it offers early-stage DeFi protocols tremendous leverage to grow on the shoulders of giants.
Focus on innovations and design mechanisms that are ‘only possible on Solana’! The infrastructure is finally at a place where a high scale of activity can be sustained — so many DeFi primitives that previously failed due to being too early are now viable again.
This was just part 1 of the Solana DeFi series – stay tuned for Part 2, “What to Build on Solana DeFi,” which will delve deeper and focus on giving builders insights into trends to watch out for, along with in-depth ideas.
Subscribe if you don’t want to miss Part 2.
Subscribe; you won’t regret :)
Subscribe
Feel free to contact me at Yash Agarwal (@yashhsm on Twitter) for any suggestions or if you have any opinions. If you find this even slightly insightful, please share it — justifies my weeks of effort and gets more eyeballs :)
Special thanks to Sitesh (Superteam), Kash (Superteam), Krish (Timeswap), Akshay (Superteam), Ata (PsyFi), and Mikey (Orca) who reviewed and provided insights at different stages of the draft.
This article is reprinted from [Blog], Forward the Original Title‘State of Solana DeFi 2024’, All copyrights belong to the original author [YASH AGARWAL]. If there are objections to this reprint, please contact the Gate Learn team, and they will handle it promptly.
Liability Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not constitute any investment advice.
Translations of the article into other languages are done by the Gate Learn team. Unless mentioned, copying, distributing, or plagiarizing the translated articles is prohibited.