📅 Gate Post 活动日历现已上线!🚀
在Gate动态参与讨论,发帖,分享你的交易逻辑和持仓组合,获取最新的加密货币市场信息。同时不要错过激动人心的Gate动态活动!从每周挑战到特别活动,总有值得奖励的活动等着您。
查看日历
🔑 完成动态任务,解锁每日、每周和特别奖励
🎁 加入动态大使,激活专属任务,赢取独家周边和福利
📍 亮点:
参与每周推荐话题活动,赢取$200奖励
参与内容挖矿,获取高达10%返佣!
“15 天发帖挑战”等特别活动,奖池高达 2,000 美元!
👉 立即收藏日历,开始你的Gate动态之旅!
立即发帖:https://www.gate.io/post
Here_s Why Shiba Inu (SHIB) Burn Rate Exploded 350% in a Day
Shiba Inu is one of the projects known for its burning mechanics – a method used to purposefully destroy SHIB tokens and permanently remove them from circulation.
SHIB’s burning process has gone through some changes, and you can find more about how it works in our recent detailed explainer here.
That said, the burn rate has skyrocketed over the past 24 hours, so let’s have a closer look.
SHIB Burn Rate Skyrockets 350% in a Day
Data fromShibburnreveals that the burn rate of SHIB tokens in the past 24 hours has increased by a whopping 350 percent.
Shibburn is the burn portal, which tracks important burn-related metrics, including the total burnt from the initial supply, the current circulating supply, as well as the number of xSHIB tokens – these are the staked SHIB tokens.
Per this analytics resource, almost 150 million SHIB tokens were burnt in the past 24 hours alone.
Source: ShibburnBut what is the reason for this considerable increase in the burn rate?
Important Announcement from SHIB Developer
One of the Shiba Inu developers – Kaal Dhairya, shared an important update about BONE minting and renouncing in a blog post from earlier today.
The post seems to provide a technical explanation of the necessary steps toward minting the remaining BONE and renouncing the ownership of the BONE contract.
At the current time, a Timelock contract serves to protect the around which the BONE token is deployed. This contract is controlled by a multisig wallet, and the post also outlines who the owners are.
Without getting too technical, the post describes the 13 steps necessary to renounce the BONE contract while also revealing what the process is to use the Timelock contract itself. That said, Dhairya concluded: