Throughout 2024, Bitcoin has experienced a dynamic journey marked by corrections, surges, all-time highs, Federal Reserve interest rate cuts, and the U.S. presidential election. For investors, understanding its value remains critical. This article analyzes three key valuation models, comparing their strengths and limitations to provide comprehensive investment insights from multiple perspectives.
BTC/USDT Trend Over the Past Year(Source: tradingview)
The S2F model, proposed by renowned crypto analyst PlanB on Twitter [1], uses Bitcoin’s “scarcity” to predict its price. The core idea is that over time, Bitcoin’s supply will diminish while demand continues to grow, resulting in a rise in Bitcoin’s price.
Bitcoin Price Predictions Based on the S2F Model(Source: bitcoinmagazinepro)
This chart overlays Bitcoin’s price on the stock-to-flow ratio curve. According to the S2F model, Bitcoin’s future mining activity can be used to predict price trends.
The color of the price line indicates the number of days until the next halving event. Bitcoin halving occurs every 210,000 blocks (approximately every 4 years), reducing miner rewards by 50% until the total supply reaches 21 million coins. Based on the S2F model, halving events increase the stock-to-flow ratio, and the resulting rise in scarcity theoretically drives prices upward.
The deviation curve below represents the difference between the price and the stock-to-flow ratio. The deviation curve shifts from green to red when the price exceeds the ratio.
[1] Plan B:
Plan B is an anonymous Bitcoin analyst on Twitter, whose name originates from Bitcoin often referred to as “Plan B.” This is because many Bitcoin supporters believe that Bitcoin could potentially become a global reserve currency in the future, leading to a shift from the current government and central bank-controlled monetary system (Plan A) to a Bitcoin-based system (Plan B).
Metcalfe’s Law describes the relationship between a network’s value and its number of users (or network growth). Proposed by George Gilder, it was named after Robert Metcalfe, the co-inventor of Ethernet, in recognition of his contributions to networking.
The law states that the more users a network has, the greater the value of the entire network and each connected device. Specifically, the value of a network is proportional to the square of the number of its nodes, meaning the network’s value increases quadratically with the number of users.
For example, a single fax machine has no utility, but as the number of fax machines increases, the value of each one grows because users can interact with more people. Similarly, when a popular writer posts a social media update, its views (likes, comments) grow exponentially in relation to the network’s and social platform’s user base. This principle applies to social networks and cryptocurrency networks alike.
Metcalfe’s Law plays a critical role in the operation of cryptocurrency networks, which can be explained from the following perspectives:
Metcalfe’s Law assumes that all users in a network have the same value, but in reality, the quality of connections between users can vary significantly. For example:
The cryptocurrency market is affected by numerous external factors that may not be directly related to network effects but significantly impact price and value, including:
In summary, while Metcalfe’s Law primarily measures value based on user numbers, it overlooks the diversity of user behavior and application scenarios. Additionally, the cryptocurrency market is known for its volatility, and Metcalfe’s Law cannot fully explain short-term price fluctuations. Investors are advised to combine Metcalfe’s Law with other methodologies, such as technical and fundamental analyses, for a more comprehensive evaluation.
The process of generating Bitcoin, known as “mining,” involves miners validating transactions by solving complex mathematical problems to earn block rewards. Mining requires significant electricity consumption, specialized hardware, and ongoing operational costs, making mining costs a key indicator of Bitcoin’s value.
The mining cost-based valuation model posits that Bitcoin’s value should be greater than or equal to its production cost. For miners, Bitcoin is a “business,” and when Bitcoin’s price falls below the break-even cost of mining, less efficient miners may become unprofitable and eventually exit the market.
Total Mining Cost Per Bitcoin(Source: macromicro)
Based on data from Cambridge University, this chart estimates the average cost for miners worldwide to produce one Bitcoin by analyzing global Bitcoin “electricity consumption” and “daily new issuance.”
When Bitcoin’s price exceeds production costs, mining becomes profitable, potentially leading to the expansion of mining operations or the entry of new miners, which increases mining difficulty and raises production costs. Conversely, the opposite occurs when prices drop.
Over the long term, Bitcoin’s price and production cost tend to align, as any discrepancy causes miners to either enter or exit the market, leading to convergence between price and cost trends.
This article provides investors with diverse perspectives, ranging from the scarcity analysis of the Stock-to-Flow Model and the network effects of Metcalfe’s Law, to the baseline price reference offered by the Mining Cost Model. Each model offers unique insights into Bitcoin’s market value but also has its limitations, making it challenging to comprehensively reflect the complexities of the Bitcoin market when used alone.
Relying solely on a single model may be overly simplistic for investors. Combining multiple valuation models with technical indicators (such as moving averages, trading volume, and macroeconomic data) is recommended. A multidimensional analysis can help reduce risks and improve the accuracy of investment decisions.
Bitcoin is often regarded as “digital gold” due to its decentralized, scarce nature and its functions as a hedge and store of value. However, its long-term value will inevitably depend on whether it becomes widely accepted as a global digital currency. Bitcoin still faces significant challenges, such as whether its high volatility makes it suitable as a medium of exchange and the impact of regulatory policies. Readers are encouraged to share their perspectives on these topics.
Comparison of Valuation Models
Throughout 2024, Bitcoin has experienced a dynamic journey marked by corrections, surges, all-time highs, Federal Reserve interest rate cuts, and the U.S. presidential election. For investors, understanding its value remains critical. This article analyzes three key valuation models, comparing their strengths and limitations to provide comprehensive investment insights from multiple perspectives.
BTC/USDT Trend Over the Past Year(Source: tradingview)
The S2F model, proposed by renowned crypto analyst PlanB on Twitter [1], uses Bitcoin’s “scarcity” to predict its price. The core idea is that over time, Bitcoin’s supply will diminish while demand continues to grow, resulting in a rise in Bitcoin’s price.
Bitcoin Price Predictions Based on the S2F Model(Source: bitcoinmagazinepro)
This chart overlays Bitcoin’s price on the stock-to-flow ratio curve. According to the S2F model, Bitcoin’s future mining activity can be used to predict price trends.
The color of the price line indicates the number of days until the next halving event. Bitcoin halving occurs every 210,000 blocks (approximately every 4 years), reducing miner rewards by 50% until the total supply reaches 21 million coins. Based on the S2F model, halving events increase the stock-to-flow ratio, and the resulting rise in scarcity theoretically drives prices upward.
The deviation curve below represents the difference between the price and the stock-to-flow ratio. The deviation curve shifts from green to red when the price exceeds the ratio.
[1] Plan B:
Plan B is an anonymous Bitcoin analyst on Twitter, whose name originates from Bitcoin often referred to as “Plan B.” This is because many Bitcoin supporters believe that Bitcoin could potentially become a global reserve currency in the future, leading to a shift from the current government and central bank-controlled monetary system (Plan A) to a Bitcoin-based system (Plan B).
Metcalfe’s Law describes the relationship between a network’s value and its number of users (or network growth). Proposed by George Gilder, it was named after Robert Metcalfe, the co-inventor of Ethernet, in recognition of his contributions to networking.
The law states that the more users a network has, the greater the value of the entire network and each connected device. Specifically, the value of a network is proportional to the square of the number of its nodes, meaning the network’s value increases quadratically with the number of users.
For example, a single fax machine has no utility, but as the number of fax machines increases, the value of each one grows because users can interact with more people. Similarly, when a popular writer posts a social media update, its views (likes, comments) grow exponentially in relation to the network’s and social platform’s user base. This principle applies to social networks and cryptocurrency networks alike.
Metcalfe’s Law plays a critical role in the operation of cryptocurrency networks, which can be explained from the following perspectives:
Metcalfe’s Law assumes that all users in a network have the same value, but in reality, the quality of connections between users can vary significantly. For example:
The cryptocurrency market is affected by numerous external factors that may not be directly related to network effects but significantly impact price and value, including:
In summary, while Metcalfe’s Law primarily measures value based on user numbers, it overlooks the diversity of user behavior and application scenarios. Additionally, the cryptocurrency market is known for its volatility, and Metcalfe’s Law cannot fully explain short-term price fluctuations. Investors are advised to combine Metcalfe’s Law with other methodologies, such as technical and fundamental analyses, for a more comprehensive evaluation.
The process of generating Bitcoin, known as “mining,” involves miners validating transactions by solving complex mathematical problems to earn block rewards. Mining requires significant electricity consumption, specialized hardware, and ongoing operational costs, making mining costs a key indicator of Bitcoin’s value.
The mining cost-based valuation model posits that Bitcoin’s value should be greater than or equal to its production cost. For miners, Bitcoin is a “business,” and when Bitcoin’s price falls below the break-even cost of mining, less efficient miners may become unprofitable and eventually exit the market.
Total Mining Cost Per Bitcoin(Source: macromicro)
Based on data from Cambridge University, this chart estimates the average cost for miners worldwide to produce one Bitcoin by analyzing global Bitcoin “electricity consumption” and “daily new issuance.”
When Bitcoin’s price exceeds production costs, mining becomes profitable, potentially leading to the expansion of mining operations or the entry of new miners, which increases mining difficulty and raises production costs. Conversely, the opposite occurs when prices drop.
Over the long term, Bitcoin’s price and production cost tend to align, as any discrepancy causes miners to either enter or exit the market, leading to convergence between price and cost trends.
This article provides investors with diverse perspectives, ranging from the scarcity analysis of the Stock-to-Flow Model and the network effects of Metcalfe’s Law, to the baseline price reference offered by the Mining Cost Model. Each model offers unique insights into Bitcoin’s market value but also has its limitations, making it challenging to comprehensively reflect the complexities of the Bitcoin market when used alone.
Relying solely on a single model may be overly simplistic for investors. Combining multiple valuation models with technical indicators (such as moving averages, trading volume, and macroeconomic data) is recommended. A multidimensional analysis can help reduce risks and improve the accuracy of investment decisions.
Bitcoin is often regarded as “digital gold” due to its decentralized, scarce nature and its functions as a hedge and store of value. However, its long-term value will inevitably depend on whether it becomes widely accepted as a global digital currency. Bitcoin still faces significant challenges, such as whether its high volatility makes it suitable as a medium of exchange and the impact of regulatory policies. Readers are encouraged to share their perspectives on these topics.
Comparison of Valuation Models