The Babylon platform has announced the official launch of its Bitcoin staking mainnet. In the first phase, the platform set a staking cap of 1,000 BTC, which has already been fully reached. According to platform data, over 12,700 users have participated in staking, with the total staked value exceeding 1,000 BTC.
Babylon is a protocol designed to leverage Bitcoin’s security to provide protection for other PoS chains. Babylon offers a secure, cross-chain-free, and non-custodial native staking solution for PoS chains, including BTC Layer 2, while promoting cross-chain interoperability. It is often compared to Eigenlayer in the Ethereum ecosystem.
The Bitcoin ecosystem has now entered a major infrastructure phase, with various players rushing into the BTCFi space, as this sector holds nearly $1.5 trillion worth of assets waiting to be activated. Below is an overview of leading BTCFi projects:
BounceBit
BounceBit integrates CeFi and DeFi, offering more flexible yield options for Bitcoin. Through liquidity custody and re-staking, users can earn returns across multiple chains.
Solv Protocol
Solv Protocol has created an all-chain yield Bitcoin asset called SolvBTC, bringing Bitcoin liquidity into various DeFi protocols.
Core Features:
Yala aims to build a multi-chain stablecoin ecosystem leveraging Bitcoin’s liquidity.
Core Features:
Currently, many protocols use centralized security solutions, such as CeFi and multi-signature, to maximize value flow on the Bitcoin chain. Although on-chain verification methods like UTXO provide decentralization and security, Bitcoin’s lack of a comprehensive smart contract system limits value flow, making on-chain verification more common in re-staking scenarios.
Returning to the re-staking sector where Babylon operates, blockchains primarily share security consensus through modular approaches. Modular blockchains provide infrastructure for other blockchains by “leasing” the security, decentralization, and value consensus of high-quality public chains like Bitcoin and Ethereum, thereby improving blockchain performance and efficiency. Currently, there are three main types of solutions:
Ethereum-Based Solutions:
New DA Layer Solutions (e.g., Celestia):
Proof-of-Stake (PoS) Shared Security Solutions (e.g., Babylon, EigenLayer):
Babylon employs a Proof-of-Stake (PoS) core concept, using the value of Bitcoin or Ethereum assets to create shared security services. The advantages include inheriting legitimacy and security while providing more practical value for main chain assets and offering greater flexibility. However, this raises several considerations:
In the Ethereum network, stakers generally bear more security responsibility than non-stakers because staked ETH participates in consensus maintenance, whereas circulating ETH benefits from network security but incurs the opportunity cost of staking. From a shared security perspective, PoS shared security solutions are currently inferior to Ethereum’s base solutions, unless the PoS assets are stETH or similar, as stETH corresponds to staked ETH in the Ethereum network, implying that if Ethereum’s network is secure, other PoS networks using stETH for staking are also secure.
Babylon’s PoW+PoS solution has an incomplete security sharing logic. Bitcoin network security is primarily maintained by miners. Although miners are driven by the value of BTC tokens, Bitcoin holders who stake in the Babylon protocol do not directly maintain Bitcoin network security, nor do they directly transfer Bitcoin network security to the PoS networks connected through Babylon. This raises the question of whether security beneficiaries can also transfer security guarantees to others. Essentially, the security of the PoS network is less related to the Bitcoin network and more closely tied to Bitcoin stakers. Therefore, we need to consider whether shared security is asset-based (more like a guarantee) or network-based.
In Babylon’s first-stage design, Bitcoin holders or stakers do not actively maintain the security of Bitcoin and PoS networks. The Bitcoin network appears more passive, receiving data from PoS networks, and overall security largely depends on Babylon’s PoS network itself.
From a quantitative perspective, the initial 1,000 Bitcoin represents a very small fraction of Bitcoin’s existing circulation. Economically, PoS chains currently do not share the security of the Bitcoin network, and the security of shared assets versus the security of the network hosting those assets are two distinct concepts that warrant further exploration.
Additionally, from a technical standpoint, the coordination between PoS timestamps and Bitcoin network block timestamps presents a challenge. Bitcoin’s block time is on a minute scale, with some uncertainty in block times and transaction confirmations, while PoS networks achieve transaction finality on a second scale. This introduces a coordination issue between PoS and PoW block times.
The Bitcoin network is the most valuable decentralized network. With numerous BTCFi projects, including Babylon, there is potential for the Bitcoin network to become the foundational layer of the entire crypto industry, bringing new possibilities to the Bitcoin ecosystem.
During development, it is crucial to focus not only on inheriting decentralization attributes but also on the security of protocols and smart contracts, given the significant financial volumes involved in BTCFi projects.
This article is reproduced from [Golden Finance], the original title is “Babylon goes online, rethinking the BTCFi track”, the copyright belongs to the original author [Revc, Golden Finance], if you have any objection to the reprint, please contact Gate Learn Team, the team will handle it as soon as possible according to relevant procedures.
Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article represent only the author’s personal views and do not constitute any investment advice.
Other language versions of the article are translated by the Gate Learn team, not mentioned in Gate.io, the translated article may not be reproduced, distributed or plagiarized.
The Babylon platform has announced the official launch of its Bitcoin staking mainnet. In the first phase, the platform set a staking cap of 1,000 BTC, which has already been fully reached. According to platform data, over 12,700 users have participated in staking, with the total staked value exceeding 1,000 BTC.
Babylon is a protocol designed to leverage Bitcoin’s security to provide protection for other PoS chains. Babylon offers a secure, cross-chain-free, and non-custodial native staking solution for PoS chains, including BTC Layer 2, while promoting cross-chain interoperability. It is often compared to Eigenlayer in the Ethereum ecosystem.
The Bitcoin ecosystem has now entered a major infrastructure phase, with various players rushing into the BTCFi space, as this sector holds nearly $1.5 trillion worth of assets waiting to be activated. Below is an overview of leading BTCFi projects:
BounceBit
BounceBit integrates CeFi and DeFi, offering more flexible yield options for Bitcoin. Through liquidity custody and re-staking, users can earn returns across multiple chains.
Solv Protocol
Solv Protocol has created an all-chain yield Bitcoin asset called SolvBTC, bringing Bitcoin liquidity into various DeFi protocols.
Core Features:
Yala aims to build a multi-chain stablecoin ecosystem leveraging Bitcoin’s liquidity.
Core Features:
Currently, many protocols use centralized security solutions, such as CeFi and multi-signature, to maximize value flow on the Bitcoin chain. Although on-chain verification methods like UTXO provide decentralization and security, Bitcoin’s lack of a comprehensive smart contract system limits value flow, making on-chain verification more common in re-staking scenarios.
Returning to the re-staking sector where Babylon operates, blockchains primarily share security consensus through modular approaches. Modular blockchains provide infrastructure for other blockchains by “leasing” the security, decentralization, and value consensus of high-quality public chains like Bitcoin and Ethereum, thereby improving blockchain performance and efficiency. Currently, there are three main types of solutions:
Ethereum-Based Solutions:
New DA Layer Solutions (e.g., Celestia):
Proof-of-Stake (PoS) Shared Security Solutions (e.g., Babylon, EigenLayer):
Babylon employs a Proof-of-Stake (PoS) core concept, using the value of Bitcoin or Ethereum assets to create shared security services. The advantages include inheriting legitimacy and security while providing more practical value for main chain assets and offering greater flexibility. However, this raises several considerations:
In the Ethereum network, stakers generally bear more security responsibility than non-stakers because staked ETH participates in consensus maintenance, whereas circulating ETH benefits from network security but incurs the opportunity cost of staking. From a shared security perspective, PoS shared security solutions are currently inferior to Ethereum’s base solutions, unless the PoS assets are stETH or similar, as stETH corresponds to staked ETH in the Ethereum network, implying that if Ethereum’s network is secure, other PoS networks using stETH for staking are also secure.
Babylon’s PoW+PoS solution has an incomplete security sharing logic. Bitcoin network security is primarily maintained by miners. Although miners are driven by the value of BTC tokens, Bitcoin holders who stake in the Babylon protocol do not directly maintain Bitcoin network security, nor do they directly transfer Bitcoin network security to the PoS networks connected through Babylon. This raises the question of whether security beneficiaries can also transfer security guarantees to others. Essentially, the security of the PoS network is less related to the Bitcoin network and more closely tied to Bitcoin stakers. Therefore, we need to consider whether shared security is asset-based (more like a guarantee) or network-based.
In Babylon’s first-stage design, Bitcoin holders or stakers do not actively maintain the security of Bitcoin and PoS networks. The Bitcoin network appears more passive, receiving data from PoS networks, and overall security largely depends on Babylon’s PoS network itself.
From a quantitative perspective, the initial 1,000 Bitcoin represents a very small fraction of Bitcoin’s existing circulation. Economically, PoS chains currently do not share the security of the Bitcoin network, and the security of shared assets versus the security of the network hosting those assets are two distinct concepts that warrant further exploration.
Additionally, from a technical standpoint, the coordination between PoS timestamps and Bitcoin network block timestamps presents a challenge. Bitcoin’s block time is on a minute scale, with some uncertainty in block times and transaction confirmations, while PoS networks achieve transaction finality on a second scale. This introduces a coordination issue between PoS and PoW block times.
The Bitcoin network is the most valuable decentralized network. With numerous BTCFi projects, including Babylon, there is potential for the Bitcoin network to become the foundational layer of the entire crypto industry, bringing new possibilities to the Bitcoin ecosystem.
During development, it is crucial to focus not only on inheriting decentralization attributes but also on the security of protocols and smart contracts, given the significant financial volumes involved in BTCFi projects.
This article is reproduced from [Golden Finance], the original title is “Babylon goes online, rethinking the BTCFi track”, the copyright belongs to the original author [Revc, Golden Finance], if you have any objection to the reprint, please contact Gate Learn Team, the team will handle it as soon as possible according to relevant procedures.
Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in this article represent only the author’s personal views and do not constitute any investment advice.
Other language versions of the article are translated by the Gate Learn team, not mentioned in Gate.io, the translated article may not be reproduced, distributed or plagiarized.