🎉 ¡El desafío de creadores de contenido de Gate.io Post está en marcha ahora mismo!
📚 Comparta sus ideas sobre criptomonedas, desate su creatividad y desbloquee $3,000 en recompensas!
🌟 Cómo participar:
¡Regístrate a través de la página del evento y luego publica tus ideas sobre criptomonedas en Gate.io Post para participar exitosamente!
Únete ahora 👉 https://www.Gate.io.io/campaigns/402
📌 Puedes compartir contenido sobre temas como noticias de cripto, políticas macro de cripto, análisis técnico de tokens, sectores populares, experiencias de trading, educación cripto o guías para principi
Intel admite que el rendimiento de la CPU de la 15ª generación Ultra 200S es muy inferior al de AMD, y responde que se corregirá el "problema de software" en diciembre.
Intel recently launched the new 15th generation CPU 'Ultra 200S', but unexpectedly, it has been criticized for its poor performance. Robert Hallock, Intel's Director of Technical Marketing, recently admitted that its performance is not as expected and plans to release a patch by the end of this month or early December. (Summary: Nvidia replaces Intel as a component of the Dow Jones Index; Intel Q3 records the largest loss in history) (Background: Is Intel beyond hope? 15th generation CPU surpassed by AMD 9800X3D with '104% better performance' The fall of the blue empire) Intel, once the world's most valuable semiconductor company, has seen its stock price plummet due to poor financial reports, massive layoffs, and collective user lawsuits. It has also been kicked out of the Dow Jones Index. In order to reverse this decline, Intel recently formed an alliance with Samsung and AMD and launched the new 15th generation CPU 'Ultra 200S' in October. However, after the launch of the Ultra 200S, it has been heavily criticized for its poor performance. Geekerwan, a tech channel, released the results of the Ultra 200S review this week, testing CPU models U5 245K, U7 265K, and U9 285K (U9 285K being the highest performance). They pointed out that the gaming performance was disappointing, and even the Intel 14th generation i9 14900K outperformed the U5 245K, U7 265K, and U9 285K, criticizing Intel for 'going backwards'. Intel admits that the performance is not as expected and will release an update by the end of this month at the earliest. In response, Robert Hallock, Intel's Director of Technical Marketing, recently gave an interview to HotHardware, where he admitted that the initial benchmark test results for Core Ultra 200S did not meet expectations. He pointed out that the performance decline was due to multiple issues at the BIOS and OS levels, although he did not go into detail, he seemed to imply that there were optimization issues with the processor: 'I can't go into detail, but we have identified a series of factors at the OS and BIOS levels. I must say that the performance we saw in the tests is not what we expected or wanted.' Robert Hallock mentioned that Intel is investigating and fixing these issues and expects to release the fixes by the end of this month or early December, with a special focus on optimizing gaming performance. At the same time, various board manufacturers have released similar statements, suggesting that Intel may be developing a new microcode patch to address some of the flaws in the Core Ultra 200S processor. The patch was originally planned to be released shortly after the CPU launch, but it seems that Intel has now decided to take more time to release it. Robert Hallock also mentioned the issue of memory latency, stating that although some reviewers have observed high memory latency in certain situations, it is not the root cause of poor gaming performance. He promised that Intel will provide detailed analysis and explanations to explain what exactly affects the gaming performance of the processor. It is still difficult for Intel to compete with 9800X3D. Intel is trying to solve the problem to achieve slightly better gaming performance. As a productivity and gaming processor, reaching the performance level of Core i9 14900K is the minimum goal. However, even if the gaming performance reaches the level of 14900K, the best U9 285K, priced at $629, still struggles to compete with the market-disrupting Ryzen 7 9800X3D. Related reports: Huang Renxun laughed! Responding to AMD and Intel's alliance against Nvidia and Arm: 'Their approach is good' Is there hope for Intel? Rumor has it that Apollo is willing to invest $5 billion to help Intel turn the tide The US government 'backs Intel' to promote localization of AI chips, Huang Renxun: TSMC is good but not the only one 'Intel admits that the 15th generation Ultra 200S CPU performs poorly compared to AMD, responding to 'software issues', will fix CPU bugs in December.' This article was first published on BlockTempo, the most influential blockchain news media in the industry.